From: Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: adapt scheduler group weight and capacity for parked CPUs
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:32:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250217113252.21796-3-huschle@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217113252.21796-1-huschle@linux.ibm.com>
Parked CPUs should not be considered to be available for computation.
This implies, that they should also not contribute to the overall weight
of scheduler groups, as a large group of parked CPUs should not attempt
to process any tasks, hence, a small group of non-parked CPUs should be
considered to have a larger weight.
The same consideration holds true for the CPU capacities of such groups.
A group of parked CPUs should not be considered to have any capacity.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5eb1a3113704..287c6648a41d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9913,6 +9913,8 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
unsigned int sum_nr_running; /* Nr of all tasks running in the group */
unsigned int sum_h_nr_running; /* Nr of CFS tasks running in the group */
unsigned int sum_nr_parked;
+ unsigned int parked_cpus;
+ unsigned int parked_capacity;
unsigned int idle_cpus; /* Nr of idle CPUs in the group */
unsigned int group_weight;
enum group_type group_type;
@@ -10369,6 +10371,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
*sg_overutilized = 1;
sgs->sum_nr_parked += arch_cpu_parked(i) * rq->cfs.h_nr_queued;
+ sgs->parked_capacity += arch_cpu_parked(i) * capacity_of(i);
+ sgs->parked_cpus += arch_cpu_parked(i);
/*
* No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0
@@ -10406,9 +10410,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
}
}
- sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
+ sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity - sgs->parked_capacity;
+ if (!sgs->group_capacity)
+ sgs->group_capacity = 1;
- sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight - sgs->parked_cpus;
/* Check if dst CPU is idle and preferred to this group */
if (!local_group && env->idle && sgs->sum_h_nr_running &&
@@ -10692,6 +10698,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
sgs->sum_nr_parked += arch_cpu_parked(i) * rq->cfs.h_nr_queued;
+ sgs->parked_capacity += arch_cpu_parked(i) * capacity_of(i);
+ sgs->parked_cpus += arch_cpu_parked(i);
/*
* No need to call idle_cpu_without() if nr_running is not 0
@@ -10707,9 +10715,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
}
- sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
+ sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity - sgs->parked_capacity;
+ if (!sgs->group_capacity)
+ sgs->group_capacity = 1;
- sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight - sgs->parked_cpus;
sgs->group_type = group_classify(sd->imbalance_pct, group, sgs);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 11:32 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Tobias Huschle
2025-02-17 11:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Tobias Huschle
2025-02-18 5:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-02-20 10:53 ` Tobias Huschle
2025-02-17 11:32 ` Tobias Huschle [this message]
2025-02-17 11:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] s390/topology: Add initial implementation for selection of parked CPUs Tobias Huschle
2025-02-18 5:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] sched/fair: introduce new scheduler group type group_parked Shrikanth Hegde
2025-02-20 10:55 ` Tobias Huschle
2025-02-25 10:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250217113252.21796-3-huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--to=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).