From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F2BC282EC for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZBpdC3qYWz3bnB; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:39:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1741685983; cv=none; b=elswQ76VVeQaQWELum6Z6m+bZj/7GBgkz7QzpiK7BrPvXiy4CkAUdbwQT7p33pPPkZheMsh85wKsXFh0dfZJIa3+8uz1TriQMt9MBaTQSRR12r51QTerW7AxqLFdSPY0IncHkMhlijSGXckF+RBJSfZdgeA2ADQtrgkb8ZiIO+Iu3TkNgHDRGvFf+j08uuAgmT++b4JgbD5PHFxfY+K5hOEZnVfeZCOCkN5XBgCgjyvuRLEKhEpPvANFkPysGKp1gqaQYwM7qLnVKTRfXQN7//8uNfPTS8V4e7h4MnQtQ/qkqKVE03XkZEJejQGFKwi/5JicDfUmwHjv0o4N5bkGyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1741685983; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=102wf9qd2ao6CQWIkgU3BxaLpSqzYGDhMeXtkxNmqtE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bOhEz0FvGEXsk+9b8RMctc1dxf5XQqj3agY90BCRm4lv/F2SIuKCBU/RMT/lW2vuczR+8YCDEKmOlA6nyQR1VOpbBYG78X/A0JnkZoLfY83JtwX/yKqcW7XkoZGTefbl3p3nVLmBHsdRWO7zQBeKu8y7md2KPPYvtkyCvIjr6oHXfbvRXy0TaQvZ5ZcPVRgiH3y8hH/wi6Yf/+CxqKGQaGKHGGub9aD0U4h6GY90CN06Rwhqhrt5N8xag8p8rFusos5AByhYMIr8K10IcLlJOcjixA15IQ+6MPaF4jnJ/TjdBTMN2UlizO1zLbXwVkZhlIc1ulJffv1Q2YCGsahB1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=ipymuPYV; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=192.198.163.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=ipymuPYV; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=192.198.163.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZBpd925szz3blv for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:39:38 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741685981; x=1773221981; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=W+ThvGzyags0oy0GD0f6DFZf/gVocxjUqYpDIHny/is=; b=ipymuPYVxkiEP+3Az1xhzR/jFxBWOdcMtDTVC9P4BfRFs/1XMUwisw/h YLZ6rJDY22Gt8UrI68A+NDZE/RRfevtc5AYjZK7O77db8f6AfHaCYRvf1 pp/9myqY9Deq9E4WKegoN7rQjBKjpGGrR4PcrqUGVvPsfVPYcdbexV0rX 2hOyXKpDii5pou1UWjqqwLaMT7By9dgEtai48V6qhYHc9sk4niYwssB42 Z8hnFU3AMgS26vGei/mogDsOVRRSXLBfuPzOGD/JY5Bv8xk1/koHLq95Q Wpz0fNUU1mMIiR4IboS4EeH+x8ilDcnrYERYlE2oZsA/quNip8PODqi0Y Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LbV7JIMcROCoIIybwuJYeA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: p5Q+EzwrRRuRHk8c9xD2OA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11369"; a="53356860" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,238,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="53356860" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2025 02:39:35 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zmlavfLxSxOrlhQRGn1sdw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: q1Pg65+qTAGO+/rVHn6w4w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,238,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="121176978" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a4747d147074) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2025 02:39:32 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a4747d147074 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1trw57-0006XE-0P; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:39:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:38:26 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Haren Myneni , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, msuchanek@suse.de, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, tyreld@linux.ibm.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, haren@linux.ibm.com, sv@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] powerpc/pseries: Add papr-indices char driver for ibm,get-indices Message-ID: <202503111710.tsPk3Snj-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250309213916.762116-4-haren@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250309213916.762116-4-haren@linux.ibm.com> Hi Haren, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes linus/master v6.14-rc6] [cannot apply to next-20250307] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Haren-Myneni/powerpc-pseries-Define-common-functions-for-RTAS-sequence-calls/20250310-054319 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309213916.762116-4-haren%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH v7 3/7] powerpc/pseries: Add papr-indices char driver for ibm,get-indices config: powerpc64-randconfig-r072-20250311 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503111710.tsPk3Snj-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e15545cad8297ec7555f26e5ae74a9f0511203e7) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250311/202503111710.tsPk3Snj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503111710.tsPk3Snj-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr-indices.c:124: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'seq' not described in 'indices_sequence_begin' vim +124 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr-indices.c 110 111 /* 112 * Internal indices sequence APIs. A sequence is a series of calls to 113 * ibm,get-indices for a given location code. The sequence ends when 114 * an error is encountered or all indices for the input has been 115 * returned. 116 */ 117 118 /** 119 * indices_sequence_begin() - Begin a indices retrieval sequence. 120 * 121 * Context: May sleep. 122 */ 123 static void indices_sequence_begin(struct papr_rtas_sequence *seq) > 124 { 125 struct rtas_get_indices_params *param; 126 127 param = (struct rtas_get_indices_params *)seq->params; 128 /* 129 * We could allocate the work area before acquiring the 130 * function lock, but that would allow concurrent requests to 131 * exhaust the limited work area pool for no benefit. So 132 * allocate the work area under the lock. 133 */ 134 mutex_lock(&rtas_ibm_get_indices_lock); 135 param->work_area = rtas_work_area_alloc(RTAS_GET_INDICES_BUF_SIZE); 136 param->next = 1; 137 param->status = 0; 138 } 139 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki