From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D86C83F10 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bfl8f0Nnzz3bTf; Sun, 13 Jul 2025 09:26:42 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=139.178.84.217 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1752362802; cv=none; b=Yva+E6lxED0E/feIkA8sN0qDCmqlcq3QbKgUUpo81PPvNx8eS8aOqAXdlyneSzNyik+bvASnucefcVWJ82r3PTFs90BDE5VpG3F7LUwwZ3YqL2W00N7YAmX+zkB1nmT/cv7jgHinqd/7Tp8MSjQJ/uEJxZrwURk9ypqP/9X+mRKFov42DBVAAxuIMS6RBSlZgxPjK9fPZjYvaKoe7c3UapZ18D5BicxfdJlaYOFT1goaxU3xx4KTxGsLTaJK8XUepLw9sLxeEZfOA3yrop6dmMxMApqYYbtHAtUlR8DlDfsxAh90DK8auec2FZvDpudbOm9Opb8ud9kpSm4OfQBGPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1752362802; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=Mtm5lo+g8ZX2LiJ5ezp1zW6EHD2ya7LYJDCuds37EjM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=IovTyul5F4ajm/22vd6Wll7KKUrTytsDMQV8u554oU5DY1Iss6M7WTfMDi9SjjEDgNiYqB138FjfXWXXVAS67Rr3/2S2oKZwW9kRnjPkYzci3cEF/Q6VPJ05UAw096G0Nxcc1t/99QEUtbOoqvyQ3jHWwraItpg73Rr88QYRNPeumxBgtyP+zCwDyU3rLkmqIfrR3SwGJLMGjE4YbQhTsZKsHpQjQx3kefm7z4vE8JHX5c0bDuWKeynM4L8bfTfIJn0sYgqeE6GI2EV9ATUshOhDVq8cOCC/QJzAIe5eA38HQ1KbqBOmHN64SYrfhKf+BSStr8fEST3H+DBukNwGsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=Zj8p+TOd; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=ebiggers@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=Zj8p+TOd; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=ebiggers@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4bfl8W1y0Bz3blg for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2025 09:26:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA385C556E; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7C7AC4CEF1; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 23:26:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752362792; bh=oVRGZdE8JlbqTZ+/Vc8lJfxP7t8h25c1QhOzJeVqedA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Zj8p+TOdVPu5lLHwjDdEJchVLZkO8F/qQjiyuD+eFQGiCyDQXvpReA3aDYR+mQdXN KP5SpOK4fB3lqKTD1miviKDDEE0Rh1/t2wj68FTUNFC3sg/5fiECZziA+PJrcihbcg EO2THy+IhzDgyjilv+vvjzNXCOgoFE/oeN39RE/9xR7cJuXS8JgPpnNegYYtrAHJn/ BP8LivY5YkQlIiBVMIrbibin415AHX10jV1s3KUYIvwDc/U1pvHnZVHEgqZskmXPls 60wYxMyihVBMQ31CfcCFnnUSBzCLxCm2+RHUrC7Fd2ORRkenalB5pgZEw3rJ9WKA4R jV4MTcMcL6DBQ== From: Eric Biggers To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Eric Biggers Subject: [PATCH 25/26] ipv6: Switch to higher-level SHA-1 functions Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 16:23:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20250712232329.818226-26-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1 In-Reply-To: <20250712232329.818226-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20250712232329.818226-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit There's now a proper SHA-1 API that follows the usual conventions for hash function APIs: sha1_init(), sha1_update(), sha1_final(), sha1(). The only remaining user of the older low-level SHA-1 API, sha1_init_raw() and sha1_transform(), is ipv6_generate_stable_address(). I'd like to remove this older API, which is too low-level. Unfortunately, ipv6_generate_stable_address() does in fact skip the SHA-1 finalization for some reason. So the values it computes are not standard SHA-1 values, and it sort of does want the low-level API. Still, it's still possible to use the higher-level functions sha1_init() and sha1_update() to get the same result, provided that the resulting state is used directly, skipping sha1_final(). So, let's do that instead. This will allow removing the low-level API. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index d0e5b94c10af4..a4d47044f4557 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c @@ -3336,12 +3336,11 @@ static bool ipv6_reserved_interfaceid(struct in6_addr address) static int ipv6_generate_stable_address(struct in6_addr *address, u8 dad_count, const struct inet6_dev *idev) { static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); - static __u32 digest[SHA1_DIGEST_WORDS]; - static __u32 workspace[SHA1_WORKSPACE_WORDS]; + static struct sha1_ctx sha_ctx; static union { char __data[SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE]; struct { struct in6_addr secret; @@ -3353,36 +3352,40 @@ static int ipv6_generate_stable_address(struct in6_addr *address, struct in6_addr secret; struct in6_addr temp; struct net *net = dev_net(idev->dev); - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(data.__data) != sizeof(data)); - if (idev->cnf.stable_secret.initialized) secret = idev->cnf.stable_secret.secret; else if (net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->stable_secret.initialized) secret = net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->stable_secret.secret; else return -1; retry: spin_lock_bh(&lock); - sha1_init_raw(digest); + sha1_init(&sha_ctx); + memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data)); - memset(workspace, 0, sizeof(workspace)); memcpy(data.hwaddr, idev->dev->perm_addr, idev->dev->addr_len); data.prefix[0] = address->s6_addr32[0]; data.prefix[1] = address->s6_addr32[1]; data.secret = secret; data.dad_count = dad_count; + sha1_update(&sha_ctx, (const u8 *)&data, sizeof(data)); - sha1_transform(digest, data.__data, workspace); - + /* + * Note that the SHA-1 finalization is omitted here, and the digest is + * pulled directly from the internal SHA-1 state (making it incompatible + * with standard SHA-1). Unusual, but technically okay since the data + * length is fixed and is a multiple of the SHA-1 block size. + */ + static_assert(sizeof(data) % SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE == 0); temp = *address; - temp.s6_addr32[2] = (__force __be32)digest[0]; - temp.s6_addr32[3] = (__force __be32)digest[1]; + temp.s6_addr32[2] = (__force __be32)sha_ctx.state.h[0]; + temp.s6_addr32[3] = (__force __be32)sha_ctx.state.h[1]; spin_unlock_bh(&lock); if (ipv6_reserved_interfaceid(temp)) { dad_count++; -- 2.50.1