From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Mingming Cao <mmc@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bjking1@linux.ibm.com,
haren@linux.ibm.com, ricklind@linux.ibm.com,
davemarq@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ibmveth: Add multi buffers rx replenishment hcall support
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 11:45:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250720104540.GU2459@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250719091356.57252-1-mmc@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 05:13:56AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> This patch enables batched RX buffer replenishment in ibmveth by
> using the new firmware-supported h_add_logical_lan_buffers() hcall
> to submit up to 8 RX buffers in a single call, instead of repeatedly
> calling the single-buffer h_add_logical_lan_buffer() hcall.
>
> During the probe, with the patch, the driver queries ILLAN attributes
> to detect IBMVETH_ILLAN_RX_MULTI_BUFF_SUPPORT bit. If the attribute is
> present, rx_buffers_per_hcall is set to 8, enabling batched replenishment.
> Otherwise, it defaults to 1, preserving the original upstream behavior
> with no change in code flow for unsupported systems.
>
> The core rx replenish logic remains the same. But when batching
> is enabled, the driver aggregates up to 8 fully prepared descriptors
> into a single h_add_logical_lan_buffers() hypercall. If any allocation
> or DMA mapping fails while preparing a batch, only the successfully
> prepared buffers are submitted, and the remaining are deferred for
> the next replenish cycle.
>
> If at runtime the firmware stops accepting the batched hcall—e,g,
> after a Live Partition Migration (LPM) to a host that does not
> support h_add_logical_lan_buffers(), the hypercall returns H_FUNCTION.
> In that case, the driver transparently disables batching, resets
> rx_buffers_per_hcall to 1, and falls back to the single-buffer hcall
> in next future replenishments to take care of these and future buffers.
>
> Test were done on systems with firmware that both supports and
> does not support the new h_add_logical_lan_buffers hcall.
>
> On supported firmware, this reduces hypercall overhead significantly
> over multiple buffers. SAR measurements showed about a 15% improvement
> in packet processing rate under moderate RX load, with heavier traffic
> seeing gains more than 30%
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <mmc@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian King <bjking1@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Haren Myneni <haren@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for the update.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-20 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-19 9:13 [PATCH net-next v2] ibmveth: Add multi buffers rx replenishment hcall support Mingming Cao
2025-07-20 10:45 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-22 13:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250720104540.GU2459@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjking1@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mmc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).