* [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics
@ 2025-09-04 10:08 Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2025-09-04 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, maddy, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
This patch series introduces support for the PROBE_MEM32,
bpf_addr_space_cast and PROBE_ATOMIC instructions in the powerpc BPF JIT,
facilitating the implementation of BPF arena and arena atomics.
All selftests related to bpf_arena, bpf_arena_atomic(except
load_acquire/store_release) enablement are passing:
# ./test_progs -t arena_list
#5/1 arena_list/arena_list_1:OK
#5/2 arena_list/arena_list_1000:OK
#5 arena_list:OK
Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
# ./test_progs -t arena_htab
#4/1 arena_htab/arena_htab_llvm:OK
#4/2 arena_htab/arena_htab_asm:OK
#4 arena_htab:OK
Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
# ./test_progs -t verifier_arena
#464/1 verifier_arena/basic_alloc1:OK
#464/2 verifier_arena/basic_alloc2:OK
#464/3 verifier_arena/basic_alloc3:OK
#464/4 verifier_arena/iter_maps1:OK
#464/5 verifier_arena/iter_maps2:OK
#464/6 verifier_arena/iter_maps3:OK
#464 verifier_arena:OK
#465/1 verifier_arena_large/big_alloc1:OK
#465/2 verifier_arena_large/big_alloc2:OK
#465 verifier_arena_large:OK
Summary: 2/8 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
# ./test_progs -t arena_atomics
#3/1 arena_atomics/add:OK
#3/2 arena_atomics/sub:OK
#3/3 arena_atomics/and:OK
#3/4 arena_atomics/or:OK
#3/5 arena_atomics/xor:OK
#3/6 arena_atomics/cmpxchg:OK
#3/7 arena_atomics/xchg:OK
#3/8 arena_atomics/uaf:OK
#3/9 arena_atomics/load_acquire:SKIP
#3/10 arena_atomics/store_release:SKIP
#3 arena_atomics:OK (SKIP: 2/10)
Summary: 1/8 PASSED, 2 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Changes since v2:
* Dropped arena_spin_lock selftest fix patch from the patchset as it has
to go via bpf-next while these changes will go via powerpc tree.
v2:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250829165135.1273071-1-skb99@linux.ibm.com/
Changes since v1:
Addressed comments from Chris:
* Squashed introduction of bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store() and its usage in
one patch.
* Defined and used PPC_RAW_RLDICL_DOT to avoid the CMPDI.
* Removed conditional statement for fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
* Indicated this change is limited to powerpc64 in subject.
Addressed comments from Alexei:
* Removed skel->rodata->nr_cpus = get_nprocs() and its usage to get
currently online cpus(as it needs to be updated from userspace).
Addressed comments from Hari:
* Updated the bpf jit stack layout and associated macros to accommodate
new NVR.
v1:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250805062747.3479221-1-skb99@linux.ibm.com/
Saket Kumar Bhaskar (4):
powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions
powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction
powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic
instructions
powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 6 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 32 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 401 +++++++++++++++++++-------
5 files changed, 330 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2025-09-04 10:08 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction Saket Kumar Bhaskar
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2025-09-04 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, maddy, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
Add support for [LDX | STX | ST], PROBE_MEM32, [B | H | W | DW]
instructions. They are similar to PROBE_MEM instructions with the
following differences:
- PROBE_MEM32 supports store.
- PROBE_MEM32 relies on the verifier to clear upper 32-bit of the
src/dst register
- PROBE_MEM32 adds 64-bit kern_vm_start address (which is stored in _R26
in the prologue). Due to bpf_arena constructions such _R26 + reg +
off16 access is guaranteed to be within arena virtual range, so no
address check at run-time.
- PROBE_MEM32 allows STX and ST. If they fault the store is a nop. When
LDX faults the destination register is zeroed.
To support these on powerpc, we do tmp1 = _R26 + src/dst reg and then use
tmp1 as the new src/dst register. This allows us to reuse most of the
code for normal [LDX | STX | ST].
Additionally, bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store() is introduced to emit
instructions for storing memory values depending on the size (byte,
halfword, word, doubleword).
Stack layout is adjusted to introduce a new NVR (_R26) and to make
BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME quadword aligned (local_tmp_var is increased by
8 bytes).
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 5 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 4c26912c2e3c..2d095a873305 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -161,9 +161,10 @@ struct codegen_context {
unsigned int seen;
unsigned int idx;
unsigned int stack_size;
- int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2];
+ int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3];
unsigned int exentry_idx;
unsigned int alt_exit_addr;
+ u64 arena_vm_start;
};
#define bpf_to_ppc(r) (ctx->b2p[r])
@@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx,
- int jmp_off, int dst_reg);
+ int jmp_off, int dst_reg, u32 code);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c0684733e9d6..7d070232159f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
/* Make sure that the stack is quadword aligned. */
cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16);
+ cgctx.arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(fp->aux->arena);
/* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */
if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) {
@@ -326,7 +327,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
*/
int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off,
- int dst_reg)
+ int dst_reg, u32 code)
{
off_t offset;
unsigned long pc;
@@ -355,6 +356,9 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass
(ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4);
fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
+ if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST || BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_STX)
+ fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_NOP();
+
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32))
fixup[1] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg - 1, 0); /* clear higher 32-bit register too */
@@ -579,7 +583,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_setup_tail_call_cnt(u32 *image, struct codegen_contex
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
/* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt() */
- int tailcallcnt_offset = 6 * 8;
+ int tailcallcnt_offset = 7 * 8;
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R3, _R1, func_frame_offset - tailcallcnt_offset));
EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, -tailcallcnt_offset));
@@ -594,7 +598,7 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_restore_tail_call_cnt(u32 *image, struct codegen_cont
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)) {
/* See bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt() */
- int tailcallcnt_offset = 6 * 8;
+ int tailcallcnt_offset = 7 * 8;
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LL(_R3, _R1, -tailcallcnt_offset));
EMIT(PPC_RAW_STL(_R3, _R1, func_frame_offset - tailcallcnt_offset));
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 0aace304dfe1..3087e744fb25 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
}
ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx, insn_idx,
- jmp_off, dst_reg);
+ jmp_off, dst_reg, code);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 025524378443..569619f1b31c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -25,18 +25,18 @@
* with our redzone usage.
*
* [ prev sp ] <-------------
- * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8 |
+ * [ nv gpr save area ] 6*8 |
* [ tail_call_cnt ] 8 |
- * [ local_tmp_var ] 16 |
+ * [ local_tmp_var ] 24 |
* fp (r31) --> [ ebpf stack space ] upto 512 |
* [ frame header ] 32/112 |
* sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] --------------
*/
/* for gpr non volatile registers BPG_REG_6 to 10 */
-#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (5*8)
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE (6*8)
/* for bpf JIT code internal usage */
-#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 24
+#define BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS 32
/* stack frame excluding BPF stack, ensure this is quadword aligned */
#define BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME (STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + \
BPF_PPC_STACK_LOCALS + BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE)
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
/* BPF register usage */
#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
+#define ARENA_VM_START (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
/* BPF to ppc register mappings */
void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
@@ -67,10 +68,12 @@ void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_AX] = _R12;
ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_1] = _R9;
ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_2] = _R10;
+ /* non volatile register for kern_vm_start address */
+ ctx->b2p[ARENA_VM_START] = _R26;
}
-/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */
-#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R27
+/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r26 */
+#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R26
static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
{
@@ -89,9 +92,9 @@ static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
* [ prev sp ] <-------------
* [ ... ] |
* sp (r1) ---> [ stack pointer ] --------------
- * [ nv gpr save area ] 5*8
+ * [ nv gpr save area ] 6*8
* [ tail_call_cnt ] 8
- * [ local_tmp_var ] 16
+ * [ local_tmp_var ] 24
* [ unused red zone ] 224
*/
static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx)
@@ -99,12 +102,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_stack_local(struct codegen_context *ctx)
if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx))
return STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size;
else
- return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 24);
+ return -(BPF_PPC_STACK_SAVE + 32);
}
static int bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(struct codegen_context *ctx)
{
- return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 16;
+ return bpf_jit_stack_local(ctx) + 24;
}
static int bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(struct codegen_context *ctx, int reg)
@@ -170,10 +173,17 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
+ if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
+ bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
+
/* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */
if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP)))
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP), _R1,
STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size));
+
+ if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
+ PPC_LI64(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), ctx->arena_vm_start);
}
static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
@@ -185,6 +195,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
+ if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
+ bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
+
/* Tear down our stack frame */
if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) {
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size));
@@ -396,11 +410,11 @@ void bpf_stf_barrier(void);
asm (
" .global bpf_stf_barrier ;"
" bpf_stf_barrier: ;"
-" std 21,-64(1) ;"
-" std 22,-56(1) ;"
+" std 21,-80(1) ;"
+" std 22,-72(1) ;"
" sync ;"
-" ld 21,-64(1) ;"
-" ld 22,-56(1) ;"
+" ld 21,-80(1) ;"
+" ld 22,-72(1) ;"
" ori 31,31,0 ;"
" .rept 14 ;"
" b 1f ;"
@@ -409,6 +423,36 @@ asm (
" blr ;"
);
+static int bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 src_reg, s16 off,
+ u32 code, u32 *image)
+{
+ u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1);
+ u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2);
+
+ switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
+ case BPF_B:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STB(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_H:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STH(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_W:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_DW:
+ if (off % 4) {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
+ } else {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int emit_atomic_ld_st(const struct bpf_insn insn, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *image)
{
u32 code = insn.code;
@@ -960,6 +1004,50 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
}
break;
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
+
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
+
+ ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
+ ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ break;
+
+ case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
+ case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
+ case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
+ case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
+
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
+
+ if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_W || BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW) {
+ PPC_LI32(tmp2_reg, imm);
+ src_reg = tmp2_reg;
+ } else {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, imm));
+ src_reg = tmp2_reg;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
+ ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ break;
+
/*
* BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
*/
@@ -1112,9 +1200,10 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
* Check if 'off' is word aligned for BPF_DW, because
* we might generate two instructions.
*/
- if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW ||
- (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX)) &&
- (off & 3))
+ if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW && (off & 3)) ||
+ (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B &&
+ BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX) ||
+ (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_MEMSX))
PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
else
PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2) * 4);
@@ -1160,12 +1249,49 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
- ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg);
+ ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
break;
+ /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + ARENA_VM_START + off) */
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
+
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, src_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
+
+ switch (size) {
+ case BPF_B:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_H:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LHZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_W:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ break;
+ case BPF_DW:
+ if (off % 4) {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
+ } else {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (size != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1]))
+ addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
+
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
+ ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ break;
+
/*
* Doubleword load
* 16 byte instruction that uses two 'struct bpf_insn'
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2025-09-04 10:08 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2025-09-04 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, maddy, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
LLVM generates bpf_addr_space_cast instruction while translating
pointers between native (zero) address space and
__attribute__((address_space(N))). The addr_space=0 is reserved as
bpf_arena address space.
rY = addr_space_cast(rX, 0, 1) is processed by the verifier and
converted to normal 32-bit move: wX = wY.
rY = addr_space_cast(rX, 1, 0) : used to convert a bpf arena pointer to
a pointer in the userspace vma. This has to be converted by the JIT.
PPC_RAW_RLDICL_DOT, a variant of PPC_RAW_RLDICL is introduced to set
condition register as well.
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 10 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index 8053b24afc39..55ca49d18319 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -571,6 +571,7 @@
(0x54000001 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH(i) | __PPC_MB(mb) | __PPC_ME(me))
#define PPC_RAW_RLWIMI(d, a, i, mb, me) (0x50000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH(i) | __PPC_MB(mb) | __PPC_ME(me))
#define PPC_RAW_RLDICL(d, a, i, mb) (0x78000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_MB64(mb))
+#define PPC_RAW_RLDICL_DOT(d, a, i, mb) (0x78000000 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_MB64(mb) | 0x1)
#define PPC_RAW_RLDICR(d, a, i, me) (0x78000004 | ___PPC_RA(d) | ___PPC_RS(a) | __PPC_SH64(i) | __PPC_ME64(me))
/* slwi = rlwinm Rx, Ry, n, 0, 31-n */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 2d095a873305..748e30e8b5b4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ struct codegen_context {
unsigned int exentry_idx;
unsigned int alt_exit_addr;
u64 arena_vm_start;
+ u64 user_vm_start;
};
#define bpf_to_ppc(r) (ctx->b2p[r])
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 7d070232159f..cfa84cab0a18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
/* Make sure that the stack is quadword aligned. */
cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16);
cgctx.arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(fp->aux->arena);
+ cgctx.user_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_user_vm_start(fp->aux->arena);
/* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */
if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) {
@@ -439,6 +440,11 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call(void)
return true;
}
+bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64);
+}
+
bool bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 569619f1b31c..76efb47f02a6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -812,6 +812,16 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
*/
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst = src */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X: /* dst = src */
+
+ if (insn_is_cast_user(&insn[i])) {
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLDICL_DOT(tmp1_reg, src_reg, 0, 32));
+ PPC_LI64(dst_reg, (ctx->user_vm_start & 0xffffffff00000000UL));
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_EQ, (ctx->idx + 2) * 4);
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, tmp1_reg));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(dst_reg, tmp1_reg));
+ break;
+ }
+
if (imm == 1) {
/* special mov32 for zext */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(dst_reg, dst_reg, 0, 0, 31));
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2025-09-04 10:08 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-12 3:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Madhavan Srinivasan
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2025-09-04 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, maddy, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
The existing code for emitting bpf atomic instruction sequences for
atomic operations such as XCHG, CMPXCHG, ADD, AND, OR, and XOR has been
refactored into a reusable function, bpf_jit_emit_ppc_atomic_op().
It also computes the jump offset and tracks the instruction index for jited
LDARX/LWARX to be used in case it causes a fault.
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 76efb47f02a6..cb4d1e954961 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -423,6 +423,111 @@ asm (
" blr ;"
);
+static int bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx,
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 *jmp_off,
+ u32 *tmp_idx, u32 *addrp)
+{
+ u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1);
+ u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2);
+ u32 size = BPF_SIZE(insn->code);
+ u32 src_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn->src_reg);
+ u32 dst_reg = bpf_to_ppc(insn->dst_reg);
+ s32 imm = insn->imm;
+
+ u32 save_reg = tmp2_reg;
+ u32 ret_reg = src_reg;
+ u32 fixup_idx;
+
+ /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, insn->off));
+ /*
+ * Enforce full ordering for operations with BPF_FETCH by emitting a 'sync'
+ * before and after the operation.
+ *
+ * This is a requirement in the Linux Kernel Memory Model.
+ * See __cmpxchg_u64() in asm/cmpxchg.h as an example.
+ */
+ if ((imm & BPF_FETCH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC());
+
+ *tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
+
+ /* load value from memory into TMP_REG_2 */
+ if (size == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0));
+ /* Save old value in _R0 */
+ if (imm & BPF_FETCH)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R0, tmp2_reg));
+
+ switch (imm) {
+ case BPF_ADD:
+ case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_AND:
+ case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_OR:
+ case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_XOR:
+ case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
+ break;
+ case BPF_CMPXCHG:
+ /*
+ * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG &
+ * in src_reg for other cases.
+ */
+ ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0);
+
+ /* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */
+ if (size == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
+ /* Don't set if different from old value */
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
+ fallthrough;
+ case BPF_XCHG:
+ save_reg = src_reg;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ /* store new value */
+ if (size == BPF_DW)
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+ else
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
+ /* we're done if this succeeded */
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, *tmp_idx * 4);
+ fixup_idx = ctx->idx;
+
+ if (imm & BPF_FETCH) {
+ /* Emit 'sync' to enforce full ordering */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC());
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0));
+ /*
+ * Skip unnecessary zero-extension for 32-bit cmpxchg.
+ * For context, see commit 39491867ace5.
+ */
+ if (size != BPF_DW && imm == BPF_CMPXCHG &&
+ insn_is_zext(insn + 1))
+ *addrp = ctx->idx * 4;
+ }
+
+ *jmp_off = (fixup_idx - *tmp_idx) * 4;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 src_reg, s16 off,
u32 code, u32 *image)
{
@@ -538,7 +643,6 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code);
u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1);
u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2);
- u32 save_reg, ret_reg;
s16 off = insn[i].off;
s32 imm = insn[i].imm;
bool func_addr_fixed;
@@ -546,6 +650,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
u64 imm64;
u32 true_cond;
u32 tmp_idx;
+ u32 jmp_off;
/*
* addrs[] maps a BPF bytecode address into a real offset from
@@ -1080,93 +1185,15 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- save_reg = tmp2_reg;
- ret_reg = src_reg;
-
- /* Get offset into TMP_REG_1 */
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp1_reg, off));
- /*
- * Enforce full ordering for operations with BPF_FETCH by emitting a 'sync'
- * before and after the operation.
- *
- * This is a requirement in the Linux Kernel Memory Model.
- * See __cmpxchg_u64() in asm/cmpxchg.h as an example.
- */
- if ((imm & BPF_FETCH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC());
- tmp_idx = ctx->idx * 4;
- /* load value from memory into TMP_REG_2 */
- if (size == BPF_DW)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0));
- else
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWARX(tmp2_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg, 0));
-
- /* Save old value in _R0 */
- if (imm & BPF_FETCH)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(_R0, tmp2_reg));
-
- switch (imm) {
- case BPF_ADD:
- case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH:
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
- break;
- case BPF_AND:
- case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH:
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_AND(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
- break;
- case BPF_OR:
- case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH:
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_OR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
- break;
- case BPF_XOR:
- case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(tmp2_reg, tmp2_reg, src_reg));
- break;
- case BPF_CMPXCHG:
- /*
- * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG &
- * in src_reg for other cases.
- */
- ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0);
-
- /* Compare with old value in BPF_R0 */
- if (size == BPF_DW)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPD(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
- else
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), tmp2_reg));
- /* Don't set if different from old value */
- PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
- fallthrough;
- case BPF_XCHG:
- save_reg = src_reg;
- break;
- default:
- pr_err_ratelimited(
- "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
- code, i);
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
-
- /* store new value */
- if (size == BPF_DW)
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
- else
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp1_reg, dst_reg));
- /* we're done if this succeeded */
- PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
-
- if (imm & BPF_FETCH) {
- /* Emit 'sync' to enforce full ordering */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_SYNC());
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, _R0));
- /*
- * Skip unnecessary zero-extension for 32-bit cmpxchg.
- * For context, see commit 39491867ace5.
- */
- if (size != BPF_DW && imm == BPF_CMPXCHG &&
- insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1]))
- addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
+ ret = bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops(image, ctx, &insn[i],
+ &jmp_off, &tmp_idx, &addrs[i + 1]);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ pr_err_ratelimited(
+ "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
+ code, i);
+ }
+ return ret;
}
break;
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2025-09-04 10:08 ` Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-12 3:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Madhavan Srinivasan
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar @ 2025-09-04 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, maddy, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
powerpc supports BPF atomic operations using a loop around
Load-And-Reserve(LDARX/LWARX) and Store-Conditional(STDCX/STWCX)
instructions gated by sync instructions to enforce full ordering.
To implement arena_atomics, arena vm start address is added to the
dst_reg to be used for both the LDARX/LWARX and STDCX/STWCX instructions.
Further, an exception table entry is added for LDARX/LWARX
instruction to land after the loop on fault. At the end of sequence,
dst_reg is restored by subtracting arena vm start address.
bpf_jit_supports_insn() is introduced to selectively enable instruction
support as in other architectures like x86 and arm64.
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index cfa84cab0a18..88ad5ba7b87f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -450,6 +450,22 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call(void)
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64);
}
+bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena)
+{
+ if (!in_arena)
+ return true;
+ switch (insn->code) {
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_B:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
+ if (bpf_atomic_is_load_store(insn))
+ return false;
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64);
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
void *arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline(unsigned int size)
{
return bpf_prog_pack_alloc(size, bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index cb4d1e954961..1fe37128c876 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1163,6 +1163,32 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
break;
+ /*
+ * BPF_STX PROBE_ATOMIC (arena atomic ops)
+ */
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC | BPF_DW:
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
+ ret = bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops(image, ctx, &insn[i],
+ &jmp_off, &tmp_idx, &addrs[i + 1]);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ pr_err_ratelimited(
+ "eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
+ code, i);
+ }
+ return ret;
+ }
+ /* LDARX/LWARX should land here on exception. */
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
+ tmp_idx, jmp_off, dst_reg, code);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Retrieve the dst_reg */
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
+ break;
+
/*
* BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
*/
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
@ 2025-09-12 3:56 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2025-09-12 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, linuxppc-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar
Cc: hbathini, sachinpb, venkat88, andrii, eddyz87, mykolal, ast,
daniel, martin.lau, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh,
sdf, haoluo, jolsa, christophe.leroy, naveen, mpe, npiggin,
memxor, iii, shuah
On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:38:31 +0530, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> This patch series introduces support for the PROBE_MEM32,
> bpf_addr_space_cast and PROBE_ATOMIC instructions in the powerpc BPF JIT,
> facilitating the implementation of BPF arena and arena atomics.
>
> All selftests related to bpf_arena, bpf_arena_atomic(except
> load_acquire/store_release) enablement are passing:
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/47c7f3b7038787ee42cb9ed69825e6790dba9410
[2/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a2485d06cad3741303b9414e44f9b6d76d3713f2
[3/4] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/45ed2e8b0591eb6211d79f436f76c3af31e626af
[4/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/0c1da35b0188dd565cec907a16cb5d1bd425e0e4
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-12 3:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-04 10:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement bpf_addr_space_cast instruction Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] powerpc64/bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_emit_atomic_ops() to emit atomic instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-04 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] powerpc64/bpf: Implement PROBE_ATOMIC instructions Saket Kumar Bhaskar
2025-09-12 3:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf arena and arena atomics Madhavan Srinivasan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).