From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
"Sumit Gupta" <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] arm64: topology: Use scope-based cleanup helper
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905103828.0000726c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903131733.57637-2-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
On Wed, 3 Sep 2025 21:17:24 +0800
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn> wrote:
> Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
> annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
> counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Diff is being slightly annoying in not quite showing enough context
to see that it is fine to release this at the end of scope.
What you have done looks correct to me but there is a further
potential cleanup
for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
/* Prevent verifying same CPU twice */
ref_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
break;
//here, might as well return -EAGAIN as only thing in this block
//and now no advantage in sharing the exit path with the one that
//says we never matched the next condition.
}
if (!idle_cpu(ref_cpu))
break;
}
Either way I'm fine with this.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 5d07ee85bdae..0eebd3492669 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -307,17 +307,16 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> */
> if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
> time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> + cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> int ref_cpu;
>
> if (!policy)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!cpumask_intersects(policy->related_cpus,
> - housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK))) {
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> + housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK)))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - }
>
> for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
> if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
> @@ -329,8 +328,6 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
> break;
> }
>
> - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> -
> if (ref_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> /* No alternative to pull info from */
> return -EAGAIN;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 13:17 [PATCH v4 00/10] cpufreq: use __free() for all cpufreq_cpu_get() references Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] arm64: topology: Use scope-based cleanup helper Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 9:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ACPI: processor: thermal: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-05 9:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 9:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-05 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] cpufreq: powernv: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 9:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] PM / devfreq: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 10:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] drm/i915: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 10:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] powercap: dtpm_cpu: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-04 10:37 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-04 10:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-05 7:44 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] thermal: imx: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 10:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-05 10:21 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] thermal/drivers/ti-soc-thermal: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-05 6:57 ` Andreas Kemnade
2025-09-05 7:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-05 7:54 ` Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] PM: EM: " Zihuan Zhang
2025-09-03 13:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-03 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 13:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04 7:56 ` Zihuan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250905103828.0000726c@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).