From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
"Sean C. Dardis" <sean.c.dardis@intel.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>,
qat-linux@intel.com, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Ensure error recoverability at all times
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:15:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113161556.GA2284238@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRWnAd-PZuHMqBwd@wunner.de>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:38:09AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 04:38:31PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Despite these workarounds, recoverability at all times is not guaranteed:
> > > E.g. when a PCIe port goes through a runtime suspend and resume cycle,
> > > the "saved_state" flag is cleared by:
> > >
> > > pci_pm_runtime_resume()
> > > pci_pm_default_resume_early()
> > > pci_restore_state()
> > >
> > > ... and hence on a subsequent AER event, the port's Config Space cannot be
> > > restored.
> >
> > I guess this restore would be done by a driver's
> > pci_error_handlers.slot_reset() or .reset_done() calling
> > pci_restore_state()?
>
> Yes. Restoration of config space after an error-recovery-induced reset
> is currently always the job of the device driver.
>
> E.g. in the case of portdrv, it happens in pcie_portdrv_slot_reset().
>
> We could revisit this design decision and change the behavior to have
> pcie_do_recovery() call pci_restore_state(), thus reducing boilerplate
> in the drivers. But that would be a separate effort, orthogonal to the
> present patch.
Agreed.
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > > @@ -358,6 +358,13 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > pci_bridge_d3_update(dev);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Save config space for error recoverability. Clear state_saved
> > > + * to detect whether drivers invoked pci_save_state() on suspend.
> >
> > Can we expand this a little to explain how this is detected and what
> > drivers *should* be doing?
>
> That is documented in Documentation/power/pci.rst, "3.1.2. suspend()":
>
> "This callback is expected to quiesce the device and prepare it to be
> put into a low-power state by the PCI subsystem. It is not required
> (in fact it even is not recommended) that a PCI driver's suspend()
> callback save the standard configuration registers of the device [...]
>
> However, in some rare case it is convenient to carry out these
> operations in a PCI driver. Then, pci_save_state() [...] should be
> used to save the device's standard configuration registers [...].
> Moreover, if the driver calls pci_save_state(), the PCI subsystem will
> not execute either pci_prepare_to_sleep(), or pci_set_power_state()
> for its device, so the driver is then responsible for handling the
> device as appropriate."
Yes. I should have proposed some text for the comment, e.g.,
Save config space for error recoverability. Clear state_saved. If
driver calls pci_save_state() again, state_saved will be set and
we'll know that on suspend, the PCI core shouldn't call
pci_save_state() or change the device power state.
> > I think the reason is that the PCI core
> > can invoke pci_save_state() on suspend if the driver did not.
>
> Right. By calling pci_save_state(), a driver signals to the PCI core
> that it assumes responsibility for putting the device into a low power
> state. If a driver wants to keep a device in D0, it could call
> pci_save_state() and thus prevent the PCI core from putting it e.g.
> into D3.
It seems like there are two things going on here, and I'm not sure
they're completely compatible:
1) Driver calls pci_save_state() to take over device power
management and prevent the PCI core from doing it.
2) Driver calls pci_save_state() to capture the device state it
wants to restore when recovering from an error.
Shouldn't a driver be able to do 2) without also getting 1)?
> > I assume:
> >
> > - PCI core always calls pci_save_state() and clears state_saved when
> > device is enumerated (below)
> >
> > - When it has configured the device to the state it wants restore,
> > the driver may call pci_save_state() again, which will set
> > state_saved
> >
> > - If driver has not called pci_save_state(), i.e., state_saved is
> > still clear, we want the PCI core to call pci_save_state() during
> > suspend
>
> Right.
>
> > This sounds sensible to me. It would be nice if there were a few more
> > words about pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state() in
> > Documentation/.
> >
> > pci_save_state() isn't mentioned at all in Documentation/PCI
>
> Right, it's documented in the Documentation/power directory. :)
Yes, in the pci.rst I mentioned, but it mostly uses the "saves the
device's standard configuration registers" wording.
I'm just wishing for a more concrete mention of "pci_save_state()",
since that's where the critical "state_saved" flag is updated.
And I'm not sure Documentation/ includes anything about the idea of
a driver using pci_save_state() to capture the state it wants to
restore after an error. I guess that's obvious now that I write it
down, but I'm sure learning a lot from this conversation :)
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-12 13:25 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Universal error recoverability of devices Lukas Wunner
2025-10-12 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Ensure error recoverability at all times Lukas Wunner
2025-11-12 22:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-13 9:38 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-11-13 16:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-11-14 18:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-11-14 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-19 10:02 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-11-21 17:40 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-11-24 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-13 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-13 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-12 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] treewide: Drop pci_save_state() after pci_restore_state() Lukas Wunner
2025-11-05 14:22 ` Dave Jiang
2025-11-05 14:33 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-11-24 23:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-14 23:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Universal error recoverability of devices Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251113161556.GA2284238@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=alek.du@intel.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sean.c.dardis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).