LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, yury.norov@gmail.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	srikar@linux.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 01/17] sched/docs: Document cpu_paravirt_mask and Paravirt CPU concept
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 11:50:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119062100.1112520-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119062100.1112520-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

Add documentation for new cpumask called cpu_paravirt_mask. This could
help users in understanding what this mask and the concept behind it.

Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
 Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
index ed07efea7d02..6972c295013d 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
@@ -62,6 +62,43 @@ Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules:
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and
 sleeping idle functions.
 
+Paravirt CPUs
+=============
+
+Under virtualised environments it is possible to overcommit CPU resources.
+i.e sum of virtual CPU(vCPU) of all VM's is greater than number of physical
+CPUs(pCPU). Under such conditions when all or many VM's have high utilization,
+hypervisor won't be able to satisfy the CPU requirement and has to context
+switch within or across VM. i.e hypervisor need to preempt one vCPU to run
+another. This is called vCPU preemption. This is more expensive compared to
+task context switch within a vCPU.
+
+In such cases it is better that VM's co-ordinate among themselves and ask for
+less CPU by not using some of the vCPUs. Such vCPUs where workload can be
+avoided at the moment for less vCPU preemption are called as "Paravirt CPUs".
+Note that when the pCPU contention goes away, these vCPUs can be used again
+by the workload.
+
+Arch need to set/unset the specific vCPU in cpu_paravirt_mask. When set, avoid
+that vCPU and when unset, use it as usual.
+
+Scheduler will try to avoid paravirt vCPUs as much as it can.
+This is achieved by
+1. Not selecting paravirt CPU at wakeup.
+2. Push the task away from paravirt CPU at tick.
+3. Not selecting paravirt CPU at load balance.
+
+This works only for SCHED_RT and SCHED_NORMAL. SCHED_EXT and userspace can make
+choices accordingly using cpu_paravirt_mask.
+
+/sys/devices/system/cpu/paravirt prints the current cpu_paravirt_mask in
+cpulist format.
+
+Notes:
+1. A task pinned only on paravirt CPUs will continue to run there.
+2. This feature is available under CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+3. Refer to PowerPC for architecure implementation side.
+4. Doesn't push out any task running on isolated CPUs.
 
 Possible arch/ problems
 =======================
-- 
2.47.3



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-19  6:20 [RFC PATCH v4 00/17] Paravirt CPUs and push task for less vCPU preemption Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/17] cpumask: Introduce cpu_paravirt_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/17] sched/core: Dont allow to use CPU marked as paravirt Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/17] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/17] sched/fair: Add paravirt movements for proc sched file Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/17] sched/fair: Pass current cpu in select_idle_sibling Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/17] sched/fair: Don't consider paravirt CPUs for wakeup and load balance Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/17] sched/rt: Don't select paravirt CPU for wakeup and push/pull rt task Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/17] sched/core: Add support for nohz_full CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/17] sched/core: Push current task from paravirt CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/17] sysfs: Add paravirt CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/17] powerpc: method to initialize ec and vp cores Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/17] powerpc: enable/disable paravirt CPUs based on steal time Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/17] powerpc: process steal values at fixed intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/17] powerpc: add debugfs file for controlling handling on steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:20 ` [HELPER PATCH 1] sysfs: Provide write method for paravirt Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  7:42   ` Greg KH
2025-11-19  8:08     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  8:20       ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-19 10:01         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  8:23       ` Greg KH
2025-11-19  9:56         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19  6:21 ` [HELPER PATCH 2] helper: disable arch handling if paravirt file being written Shrikanth Hegde
2025-11-19 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/17] Paravirt CPUs and push task for less vCPU preemption Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251119062100.1112520-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox