From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43A0CF64AB for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dBtjq2Lg8z2yrT; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 20:44:47 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1763631887; cv=none; b=GMHa2E81MxsmPFgJKerxR2ifTPEhwXMmTualJqEVFac/+g1BkdenGSwVOUh9uZxNahopj6ka82ksodk3f5mW4eQee3kyXsa+Av4/EoNlpsC7xpbv3ONs3vkYycqkI/GpCkvh8+dQxCtLvumo0bMyOM3ecT7U0KWsx5noKQYRAaWVFv4T9ZoSS5p/u0YxJx21oEw+Jo2WLRqxr/V5cNo1G/1zFBmpbfnGDqum9dFP0Ysp+5nlA3RbAAP0ZwDUzt+m+JdfJj0sma94EXTlAAg8o9iI8ULCNGMKmmnOAAlagxOHm6o7oKqLT3w18MYzPziHrUDv/Jz9jSRGN8bpR6erBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1763631887; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=Pe0kfqLYuUiSKnJnC39H+rf14BGwlqCsakBEKpmuLDA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SXn5Cl2FUcVDETilnfZCQz0LLUa5haMHgBXsk2gac/baGWnLPZDVhHOiMzC0Ax2ITuP/r5OUb6JamGU3q3UNnwy5Ln1hyCzanO+E8mFxPfwuBPV6/7fUJHdczKyyHwsKw+27Hyl95MwbUfQQm65SSDsnL6CYnGmNv1XD56TFTPpmoQqrQN3ondY6FKu3yD4nlbbil7kL1mCLxT+xtRwN6fgDFarJfYsg2eFRRuo7yQ8qYhJJXmIp104zNACPaLVpGNmdg1604W7gUQTesweaOoM7LZ32qlcmlLhmfQqMnEZRixkrMNP8ed2/St6DfwJSZ4L6kK/dt7nsK/j0UFccag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=q6DPoYwS; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=q6DPoYwS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dBtjp18Rnz2yr9 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 20:44:45 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AJLkuLX012474; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:35 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=Pe0kfqLYuUiSKnJnC39H+rf14BGw lqCsakBEKpmuLDA=; b=q6DPoYwSBtY7pu/WYm9rJjD03CyvyPQ8B/LJ4jYN3fkb qgGmKzgMbvDrlUmgyKRbZxp/8gDvC+aXlNzaFRUbsjYp1rZal10VqQqrrOq/SL8h YW0BH7XoWGpYyjkmYYd+4RpcCIhpOWiCdhqqfFN3WHd/IGEeS0CfCTIZGi6lY3qD u25miTetuMnxbAG6ZXoEm9yYXWkqvgF01q2CHV7yFzPy4ui6Yn1gCEwM032zW+63 z3UTQMwuiJbEFVatr/GfEHEzKNKuq3jI6h+DIky0YiyBM2h29AYdZDi0ubFaWxxQ /4k4LC80tFR/yUnuBPSMTWUSymMiqYDnfCM0YIpAGw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aejgx49fv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0356516.ppops.net (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 5AK9Yb9M029132; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:34 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aejgx49fr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AK63A47022386; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:33 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4af4un5pr6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:33 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5AK9iTw840304972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:29 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3280A20043; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0E520040; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltcd48-lp3.ltc.tadn.ibm.com (unknown [9.5.7.39]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:44:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Narayana Murty N To: mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, tpearson@raptorengineering.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, sbhat@linux.ibm.com, ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] powerpc/eeh: fix recursive pci_lock_rescan_remove locking in EEH event handling Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 23:44:18 -0600 Message-ID: <20251120054418.3363-1-nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: HQXbn1hrniH07CMEwDqNaHVZJZ8CUIQ7 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=YqwChoYX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=691ee302 cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6UeiqGixMTsA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=qYjJlFfMWxv6U0P3q3EA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: jRRUK8i8MFBQxapvgVztVNFQzbv18noj X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMTE1MDAzMiBTYWx0ZWRfXxl/XOJfWxun4 ZqMfkUBSjvwNK9TWmsvlWoxHHZIfYT1VxTSN81lzJpq0preK/03q3MXLSdl3CGCzN/3jC12+Olf Tv92zd//pBPakzcgA7x1vbc18KMptISXh3+IKFuZNq5h0A8AtcXFe/+wYk9vQbB4iNtoOn20mWf 9UgF0YQT+g+9OcqB/Yfba11eyGOrYPAdoBzaI/xdr0TG39dhIeLGLMz4vCsSB/4gWq0lwtuc2qn AexyE//qaOYtfSHa8lhXdNzJiK+349bcUJ6QaFSKTG/J2Vi6DUqswWSGFXX45JkXcuB77myLyXT zPoKReel8ZSAM6ZtL50OO6HtqEw/NH8Dd+NQQE4U55ssHwFUIyfkBoUSzGji3pzgDPPjlgLk8+x C9SR5lZBgA+pSN3VpuKRbSdoNDuGFA== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-11-20_03,2025-11-18_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2511150032 The recent commit 1010b4c012b0 ("powerpc/eeh: Make EEH driver device hotplug safe") restructured the EEH driver to improve synchronization with the PCI hotplug layer. However, it inadvertently moved pci_lock_rescan_remove() outside its intended scope in eeh_handle_normal_event(), leading to broken PCI error reporting and improper EEH event triggering. Specifically, eeh_handle_normal_event() acquired pci_lock_rescan_remove() before calling eeh_pe_bus_get(), but eeh_pe_bus_get() itself attempts to acquire the same lock internally, causing nested locking and disrupting normal EEH event handling paths. This patch adds a boolean parameter do_lock to _eeh_pe_bus_get(), with two public wrappers: eeh_pe_bus_get() with locking enabled. eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock() that skips locking. Callers that already hold pci_lock_rescan_remove() now use eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock() to avoid recursive lock acquisition. Additionally, pci_lock_rescan_remove() calls are restored to the correct position—after eeh_pe_bus_get() and immediately before iterating affected PEs and devices. This ensures EEH-triggered PCI removes occur under proper bus rescan locking without recursive lock contention. The eeh_pe_loc_get() function has been split into two functions: eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) which retrieves the loc for given PE. eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) which retrieves the location code for given bus. This resolves lockdep warnings such as: [ 84.964298] [ T928] ============================================ [ 84.964304] [ T928] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 84.964311] [ T928] 6.18.0-rc3 #51 Not tainted [ 84.964315] [ T928] -------------------------------------------- [ 84.964320] [ T928] eehd/928 is trying to acquire lock: [ 84.964324] [ T928] c000000003b29d58 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pci_lock_rescan_remove+0x28/0x40 [ 84.964342] [ T928] but task is already holding lock: [ 84.964347] [ T928] c000000003b29d58 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pci_lock_rescan_remove+0x28/0x40 [ 84.964357] [ T928] other info that might help us debug this: [ 84.964363] [ T928] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 84.964367] [ T928] CPU0 [ 84.964370] [ T928] ---- [ 84.964373] [ T928] lock(pci_rescan_remove_lock); [ 84.964378] [ T928] lock(pci_rescan_remove_lock); [ 84.964383] [ T928] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 84.964388] [ T928] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 84.964393] [ T928] 1 lock held by eehd/928: [ 84.964397] [ T928] #0: c000000003b29d58 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pci_lock_rescan_remove+0x28/0x40 [ 84.964408] [ T928] stack backtrace: [ 84.964414] [ T928] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 928 Comm: eehd Not tainted 6.18.0-rc3 #51 VOLUNTARY [ 84.964417] [ T928] Hardware name: IBM,9080-HEX POWER10 (architected) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.00 (NH1060_022) hv:phyp pSeries [ 84.964419] [ T928] Call Trace: [ 84.964420] [ T928] [c0000011a7157990] [c000000001705de4] dump_stack_lvl+0xc8/0x130 (unreliable) [ 84.964424] [ T928] [c0000011a71579d0] [c0000000002f66e0] print_deadlock_bug+0x430/0x440 [ 84.964428] [ T928] [c0000011a7157a70] [c0000000002fd0c0] __lock_acquire+0x1530/0x2d80 [ 84.964431] [ T928] [c0000011a7157ba0] [c0000000002fea54] lock_acquire+0x144/0x410 [ 84.964433] [ T928] [c0000011a7157cb0] [c0000011a7157cb0] __mutex_lock+0xf4/0x1050 [ 84.964436] [ T928] [c0000011a7157e00] [c000000000de21d8] pci_lock_rescan_remove+0x28/0x40 [ 84.964439] [ T928] [c0000011a7157e20] [c00000000004ed98] eeh_pe_bus_get+0x48/0xc0 [ 84.964442] [ T928] [c0000011a7157e50] [c000000000050434] eeh_handle_normal_event+0x64/0xa60 [ 84.964446] [ T928] [c0000011a7157f30] [c000000000051de8] eeh_event_handler+0xf8/0x190 [ 84.964450] [ T928] [c0000011a7157f90] [c0000000002747ac] kthread+0x16c/0x180 [ 84.964453] [ T928] [c0000011a7157fe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18 Fixes: 1010b4c012b0 ("powerpc/eeh: Make EEH driver device hotplug safe") Signed-off-by: Narayana Murty N Changelog: V1: * Split eeh_pe_loc_get() into two functions — eeh_pe_loc_get() and * eeh_pe_loc_get_bus() to separate PE-to-bus lookup from PCI bus location * code retrieval, per code review suggestions. --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 2 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 11 ++--- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index 5e34611de9ef..b7ebb4ac2c71 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -289,6 +289,8 @@ void eeh_pe_dev_traverse(struct eeh_pe *root, void eeh_pe_restore_bars(struct eeh_pe *pe); const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe); struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe); +const char *eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(struct pci_bus *bus); +struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(struct eeh_pe *pe); void eeh_show_enabled(void); int __init eeh_init(struct eeh_ops *ops); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index ef78ff77cf8f..028f69158532 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe) pci_lock_rescan_remove(); - bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe); + bus = eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(pe); if (!bus) { pr_err("%s: Cannot find PCI bus for PHB#%x-PE#%x\n", __func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr); @@ -886,14 +886,15 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe) /* Log the event */ if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB) { pr_err("EEH: Recovering PHB#%x, location: %s\n", - pe->phb->global_number, eeh_pe_loc_get(pe)); + pe->phb->global_number, eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(bus)); } else { struct eeh_pe *phb_pe = eeh_phb_pe_get(pe->phb); pr_err("EEH: Recovering PHB#%x-PE#%x\n", pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr); pr_err("EEH: PE location: %s, PHB location: %s\n", - eeh_pe_loc_get(pe), eeh_pe_loc_get(phb_pe)); + eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(bus), + eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(phb_pe))); } #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE @@ -1098,7 +1099,7 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe) eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_PRI_BUS, true); eeh_pe_dev_mode_mark(pe, EEH_DEV_REMOVED); - bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe); + bus = eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(pe); if (bus) pci_hp_remove_devices(bus); else @@ -1222,7 +1223,7 @@ void eeh_handle_special_event(void) (phb_pe->state & EEH_PE_RECOVERING)) continue; - bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(phb_pe); + bus = eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(phb_pe); if (!bus) { pr_err("%s: Cannot find PCI bus for " "PHB#%x-PE#%x\n", diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index e740101fadf3..040e8f69a4aa 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -812,6 +812,24 @@ void eeh_pe_restore_bars(struct eeh_pe *pe) const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) { struct pci_bus *bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe); + return eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(bus); +} + +/** + * eeh_pe_loc_get_bus - Retrieve location code binding to the given PCI bus + * @bus: PCI bus + * + * Retrieve the location code associated with the given PCI bus. If the bus + * is a root bus, the location code is fetched from the PHB device tree node + * or root port. Otherwise, the location code is obtained from the device + * tree node of the upstream bridge of the bus. The function walks up the + * bus hierarchy if necessary, checking each node for the appropriate + * location code property ("ibm,io-base-loc-code" for root buses, + * "ibm,slot-location-code" for others). If no location code is found, + * returns "N/A". + */ +const char *eeh_pe_loc_get_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ struct device_node *dn; const char *loc = NULL; @@ -838,8 +856,9 @@ const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) } /** - * eeh_pe_bus_get - Retrieve PCI bus according to the given PE + * _eeh_pe_bus_get - Retrieve PCI bus according to the given PE * @pe: EEH PE + * @do_lock: Is the caller already held the pci_lock_rescan_remove? * * Retrieve the PCI bus according to the given PE. Basically, * there're 3 types of PEs: PHB/Bus/Device. For PHB PE, the @@ -847,7 +866,7 @@ const char *eeh_pe_loc_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) * returned for BUS PE. However, we don't have associated PCI * bus for DEVICE PE. */ -struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) +static struct pci_bus *_eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe, bool do_lock) { struct eeh_dev *edev; struct pci_dev *pdev; @@ -862,11 +881,58 @@ struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) /* Retrieve the parent PCI bus of first (top) PCI device */ edev = list_first_entry_or_null(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev, entry); - pci_lock_rescan_remove(); + if (do_lock) + pci_lock_rescan_remove(); pdev = eeh_dev_to_pci_dev(edev); if (pdev) bus = pdev->bus; - pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); + if (do_lock) + pci_unlock_rescan_remove(); return bus; } + +/** + * eeh_pe_bus_get - Retrieve PCI bus associated with the given EEH PE, locking + * if needed + * @pe: Pointer to the EEH PE + * + * This function is a wrapper around _eeh_pe_bus_get(), which retrieves the PCI + * bus associated with the provided EEH PE structure. It acquires the PCI + * rescans lock to ensure safe access to shared data during the retrieval + * process. This function should be used when the caller requires the PCI bus + * while holding the rescan/remove lock, typically during operations that modify + * or inspect PCIe device state in a safe manner. + * + * RETURNS: + * A pointer to the PCI bus associated with the EEH PE, or NULL if none found. + */ + +struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get(struct eeh_pe *pe) +{ + return _eeh_pe_bus_get(pe, true); +} + +/** + * eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock - Retrieve PCI bus associated with the given EEH PE + * without locking + * @pe: Pointer to the EEH PE + * + * This function is a variant of _eeh_pe_bus_get() that retrieves the PCI bus + * associated with the specified EEH PE without acquiring the + * pci_lock_rescan_remove lock. It should only be used when the caller can + * guarantee safe access to PE structures without the need for that lock, + * typically in contexts where the lock is already held locking is otherwise + * managed. + * + * RETURNS: + * pointer to the PCI bus associated with the EEH PE, or NULL if none is found. + * + * NOTE: + * Use this function carefully to avoid race conditions and data corruption. + */ + +struct pci_bus *eeh_pe_bus_get_nolock(struct eeh_pe *pe) +{ + return _eeh_pe_bus_get(pe, false); +} -- 2.51.1