From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D89D5B15E for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 18:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dTF6R3gLzz2xZK; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 05:22:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1765650143; cv=none; b=i9T4zghXg0ZOD9uWcub6miT7pJ6e2axBqoDuuh73gln3TVcsfJyEf1vRsExqY4PEhtEpd8wFzAVIS6m6Y1BHqPeUnD6SLvEljJs4Wm1CbL0bPbiejK5FYoZJa1cHvuIxtRCkXUmo3B39BaEZ0WuQyeoNT5Buz2IoVhSzyuuVBDPljsnYY6/1FrugKPr2570MLqXng7DITerHCF5rwiK13LawtUYMJGMY+nsCYjVdqnFhnqqCzwkvuGIL/lyxk3fGw4K40Tc7mOQEA9+8R6IaW4fe7ngHmdMPinjM/tk1cciuSyL36U3FxILmfUSXq0UozF8qWaC/Ghz1V0/RctpqWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1765650143; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=NfHOPinuyaDk2vNExJlfAE6VynkvMxSpvVwwVbEFkPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g/PR3v8VTM7PR1nHhHoE682urxTZsbL/fHzdqDKgA6qck/hV75mqAGQ0rilNtu0vAV8FVSBfAPB38B1DjzJDadWNkO25cjOOdZuRYi6gMUmzrnwBnqrboj5Y0Ib+2e2eIO4guOOof8pGhcqPr9W3/KAZq9EMS+1hdeqcXIm0ZMxMD0K55HN7nNtm28r5Z5I0m8N+tbgG4DLo9Hrf+Qqgo2KhjdN2yGJ0Qsl1DwMSTdnV3a70s672y04/P+bQqj77HvRyVXHlipZQ0RRWmKDhyUiDBDr07j568k9HBM0UagC9D7+pNKNGJXTGlswM95RXM7MolmJedeNyxaNO7XTW3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=bx8mD/K6; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=198.175.65.16; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=bx8mD/K6; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=198.175.65.16; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dTF6N2sgvz2xKh for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2025 05:22:18 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765650141; x=1797186141; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VuBIHLj7oBoIFj+NYV7CqgXjiAwFMwo/5flHJXzbGpU=; b=bx8mD/K6znMgp832B4hSrg+G5p8cLPSHatLCntjvhxLe2XBhrRA4gYZN zaFwUUzPdXqHYH/soCv/fWM4x36kcPb/KzPzsmGyVQFk2EgQZk9yOUvWT Ti3lUhzUxSX5yiHC7uVRxSRS/3tyvXGOipaPTw/k0pUzK1mXPzCo8rYNT /LQbQ2IwuKyCIoXoGR+yv3zVz/PP86eREe9NKrfpY4wnqwIemAiR8QPfd ZKXujgmXNzQU9R/vYvPdrIuNyDgFahGnCQxMBsH4fLdtWRqG8jiXzjKqg wdW/1xwZI9S5SO//gd2Ti6bH4ZTBzTAAZnPZY/3lbpNP0GNU9uKQipw9C Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IHVD8OFHSoiQ0rp8fASv5Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +Br72eL3S0eH3C5uykQD0A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11641"; a="67775491" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,147,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="67775491" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2025 10:22:14 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kpb4Me8lSF+sDoGI1o3j3g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uTVLjPT4R3a324lOlH8OJg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,147,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="197620802" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d335e3c6db51) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2025 10:22:11 -0800 Received: from kbuild by d335e3c6db51 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vUUFs-00000000837-40oj; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 18:22:08 +0000 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 02:21:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Srish Srinivasan , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, jarkko@kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, ssrish@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: move the PLPKS config inside its own sysfs directory Message-ID: <202512140150.PUqCvp88-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251213052618.190691-3-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251213052618.190691-3-ssrish@linux.ibm.com> Hi Srish, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes zohar-integrity/next-integrity linus/master v6.18 next-20251212] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Srish-Srinivasan/pseries-plpks-fix-kernel-doc-comment-inconsistencies/20251213-132948 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251213052618.190691-3-ssrish%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: move the PLPKS config inside its own sysfs directory config: powerpc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251214/202512140150.PUqCvp88-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251214/202512140150.PUqCvp88-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512140150.PUqCvp88-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c:59: >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpks.h:118:12: warning: 'plpks_config_create_softlink' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 118 | static int plpks_config_create_softlink(struct kobject *from) { return 0; } | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/plpks_config_create_softlink +118 arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpks.h 111 112 int plpks_config_create_softlink(struct kobject *from); 113 #else // CONFIG_PSERIES_PLPKS 114 static inline bool plpks_is_available(void) { return false; } 115 static inline u16 plpks_get_passwordlen(void) { BUILD_BUG(); } 116 static inline void plpks_early_init_devtree(void) { } 117 static inline int plpks_populate_fdt(void *fdt) { BUILD_BUG(); } > 118 static int plpks_config_create_softlink(struct kobject *from) { return 0; } 119 #endif // CONFIG_PSERIES_PLPKS 120 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki