From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67709D72345 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dy8xW2S7jz3cH0; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 18:41:03 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1769154063; cv=none; b=L5cWnAS0XZy3NRyANykFd8Ji2PJGqbI7F1jm5EOGZuAgVZENpR3+9uN6oWP0S4j8QFBZJYcabVaWPfMm+B9F2xbnKW8ALH5ybIyH3FBvqKleichDhwCsdzvmbA+EvBG+IddKPGikf3oi4jqFNbmYPJSjj8VOUcyk1hmexRhVH+EtCNPAPgcD8z4p32j3pSxyW9Nu3R2x7LSL+kZeegtXtQJgDAKuyzu34VWO9yMIqK0DA5QykXjvPGHnRhh8jGwhtYdnEZU7J61CyR9Xx5tB67XDF4j0nYIomg5diYvrQcMuN1DqBTUubkAXuUpGwGhGUTSkYAuvMwNpHd176BPrZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1769154063; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=IlhhU0cb4Fdv+gXg8co9lSW2r2fccTJNCyp5vMf13YA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=TkC6zeplifCfZ5HnTsu+VeCj3VArjk3Oe3V36YVovkG4/T+kwgLpW4kmBb5/4JN5XY6o5qgstP1n+ZHD1LB1NY7eQjKrP4cXBB7m73Wp9gRygDLmc58gdOMXj6Pv22EIpnu7Hu6RLzeqN4szNDhNc7Dup6HhvAtr+sggSS8IpDuWe0h+p/q2SGCR2wN4OKoDb1mulfMFLNo8XVWqjRgn1AqxxXnT3K1iTFrNa5nbayBKDKZ0dybInBdz9Xyr1+3gYBvswcz5YG7wDZQ+s2kGhoCDX7mklo0/WGeVw3Rj15Gvin52+u11czu/fRhmvPdQB611g7EAIWgtTaHNBWf4cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HIgMr6CT; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=mkchauras@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HIgMr6CT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=mkchauras@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dy8xV4TBCz3cH3 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 18:41:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 60N2K0nY019547; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=IlhhU0cb4Fdv+gXg8 co9lSW2r2fccTJNCyp5vMf13YA=; b=HIgMr6CT0679rF0V6/vFsIpVZ7jTYSnG3 zeW8oXvjkppZ+GoiwKFCAin9D+4W/5kuRdQdPs82H7DaVo+EQ2IzYXXbSu5ejYFv VEsE8uIMAAnT+36M3qi5p1QsoKjXE7UMXiF4CtO8bT0h3420fYrO7cZZqdShptf0 DIyMIGyBYUCbyIKYpKXT/i7zQYSNYlUq5j7FspKQDhMEnCxjbuNw7n+xruIIEaRW YkK4LZbIN+UEDdyMQodVar3FsjEnWgyWsWDlWEFqqbS/pT0T25v/wNx/JDugi9kW l+A2JeU55xB34fvbzqReMC9U1nxrT87CjyQ5ctRaYDWqeKcPNhZsQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4br256ekqg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0356517.ppops.net (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 60N7drE5027568; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:37 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4br256ekqd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 60N7NABv009295; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:36 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4brp8kqr7a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:36 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 60N7eVMq21430744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:31 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA382004D; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCA62004B; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-1a3e774c-28e4-11b2-a85c-acc9f2883e29.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.124.222.171]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:40:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya To: maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, oleg@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net, wad@chromium.org, mchauras@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, ruanjinjie@huawei.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, charlie@rivosinc.com, deller@gmx.de, ldv@strace.io, macro@orcam.me.uk, segher@kernel.crashing.org, peterz@infradead.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, namcao@linutronix.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mark.barnett@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya Subject: [PATCH v4 8/8] powerpc: Remove unused functions Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:09:16 +0530 Message-ID: <20260123073916.956498-9-mkchauras@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 In-Reply-To: <20260123073916.956498-1-mkchauras@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260123073916.956498-1-mkchauras@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwMTIzMDA1NSBTYWx0ZWRfXzzrPNlJhGXXG Co2qnPmR6w2vVtcO/PlnjEHBu9bKZbbcwYWffuEVIMQGGpTL975dO641e9V8uEVUYQ+a5RKucGM 9cufkwmt0hJc2J/w/a6JUBhBpGa5/JixM4FzAnEROFP9cynR2Tv+xCQU5yh9eGi2QFfpEZgN57q 4migjSyywZZ+JET8w1x6eDwom7LE88ypDE1mq7oT3VPAvz3s9mlXdQl808nEa3dHt/HCfMaOF6m d9SlGDf/0A/HNPypSOZNWZlZT3AAW4nC2HK9tjIQli6+0gDwAT52bUP09cL5TgK4FBLvlRt8BEs mIFZ3SAkA6N+MBsYFapFuhyEnDjmHU5Cv4DHRTXbVRooV6ZHeFGCbFkyO4mnbAIcxjhgp/3PCaX NEC30SUUr/KR1ZG9BJQTzn6XqOQuVFLHgv31MQWerAnDf7JdOckVkJw7JfuFus02uFr9CEUptT8 zKhfOmJ16w5+EUAvoyA== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=BpSQAIX5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=697325f6 cx=c_pps a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:117 a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:17 a=vUbySO9Y5rIA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=AFa1QFvt9TWlA0SYsw8A:9 X-Proofpoint-GUID: feRwsJYaDZwxBi4REYl-ZlIgPycVI7x7 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PqIqB-LCbf289i_ierjyWMgG2aDTUzPn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.20,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-01-22_06,2026-01-22_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2601150000 definitions=main-2601230055 After enabling GENERIC_ENTRY some functions are left unused. Cleanup all those functions which includes: - do_syscall_trace_enter - do_syscall_trace_leave - do_notify_resume - do_seccomp Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 3 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/signal.h | 1 - arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c | 138 ---------------------------- arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c | 17 ---- 4 files changed, 159 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h index 2e741ea57b80..fdeb97421785 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h @@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ extern unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs); #define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs) #endif -long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs); -void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs); - static inline void set_return_regs_changed(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/signal.h index 922d43700fb4..21af92cdb237 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/signal.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/signal.h @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ #include struct pt_regs; -void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_info_flags); unsigned long get_min_sigframe_size_32(void); unsigned long get_min_sigframe_size_64(void); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c index f006a03a0211..316d4f5ead8e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace/ptrace.c @@ -192,144 +192,6 @@ long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, return ret; } -#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP -static int do_seccomp(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP)) - return 0; - - /* - * The ABI we present to seccomp tracers is that r3 contains - * the syscall return value and orig_gpr3 contains the first - * syscall parameter. This is different to the ptrace ABI where - * both r3 and orig_gpr3 contain the first syscall parameter. - */ - regs->gpr[3] = -ENOSYS; - - /* - * We use the __ version here because we have already checked - * TIF_SECCOMP. If this fails, there is nothing left to do, we - * have already loaded -ENOSYS into r3, or seccomp has put - * something else in r3 (via SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO/TRACE). - */ - if (__secure_computing()) - return -1; - - /* - * The syscall was allowed by seccomp, restore the register - * state to what audit expects. - * Note that we use orig_gpr3, which means a seccomp tracer can - * modify the first syscall parameter (in orig_gpr3) and also - * allow the syscall to proceed. - */ - regs->gpr[3] = regs->orig_gpr3; - - return 0; -} -#else -static inline int do_seccomp(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; } -#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP */ - -/** - * do_syscall_trace_enter() - Do syscall tracing on kernel entry. - * @regs: the pt_regs of the task to trace (current) - * - * Performs various types of tracing on syscall entry. This includes seccomp, - * ptrace, syscall tracepoints and audit. - * - * The pt_regs are potentially visible to userspace via ptrace, so their - * contents is ABI. - * - * One or more of the tracers may modify the contents of pt_regs, in particular - * to modify arguments or even the syscall number itself. - * - * It's also possible that a tracer can choose to reject the system call. In - * that case this function will return an illegal syscall number, and will put - * an appropriate return value in regs->r3. - * - * Return: the (possibly changed) syscall number. - */ -long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - u32 flags; - - flags = read_thread_flags() & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); - - if (flags) { - int rc = ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs); - - if (unlikely(flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { - /* - * A nonzero return code from - * ptrace_report_syscall_entry() tells us to prevent - * the syscall execution, but we are not going to - * execute it anyway. - * - * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want - * to avoid clobbering any registers, so we don't goto - * the skip label below. - */ - return -1; - } - - if (rc) { - /* - * The tracer decided to abort the syscall. Note that - * the tracer may also just change regs->gpr[0] to an - * invalid syscall number, that is handled below on the - * exit path. - */ - goto skip; - } - } - - /* Run seccomp after ptrace; allow it to set gpr[3]. */ - if (do_seccomp(regs)) - return -1; - - /* Avoid trace and audit when syscall is invalid. */ - if (regs->gpr[0] >= NR_syscalls) - goto skip; - - if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))) - trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->gpr[0]); - - if (!is_32bit_task()) - audit_syscall_entry(regs->gpr[0], regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4], - regs->gpr[5], regs->gpr[6]); - else - audit_syscall_entry(regs->gpr[0], - regs->gpr[3] & 0xffffffff, - regs->gpr[4] & 0xffffffff, - regs->gpr[5] & 0xffffffff, - regs->gpr[6] & 0xffffffff); - - /* Return the possibly modified but valid syscall number */ - return regs->gpr[0]; - -skip: - /* - * If we are aborting explicitly, or if the syscall number is - * now invalid, set the return value to -ENOSYS. - */ - regs->gpr[3] = -ENOSYS; - return -1; -} - -void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - int step; - - audit_syscall_exit(regs); - - if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))) - trace_sys_exit(regs, regs->result); - - step = test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP); - if (step || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) - ptrace_report_syscall_exit(regs, step); -} - void __init pt_regs_check(void); /* diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c index 9f1847b4742e..bb42a8b6c642 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c @@ -293,23 +293,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) signal_setup_done(ret, &ksig, test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)); } -void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_info_flags) -{ - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) - uprobe_notify_resume(regs); - - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING) - klp_update_patch_state(current); - - if (thread_info_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) { - BUG_ON(regs != current->thread.regs); - do_signal(current); - } - - if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) - resume_user_mode_work(regs); -} - static unsigned long get_tm_stackpointer(struct task_struct *tsk) { /* When in an active transaction that takes a signal, we need to be -- 2.52.0