public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn, tglx@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org,
	gjoyce@ibm.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 11:31:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219173149.GA3486808@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260217174537.1154686-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>

[+cc sparc folks, PCI enumeration via OF likely broken]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:15:26PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> Recent changes [1] replaced the use of no_64bit_msi with msi_addr_mask.
> As a result, msi_addr_mask is now expected to be initialized to
> DMA_BIT_MASK(64) when a pci_dev is set up. However, this initialization
> was missed on powerpc due to differences in the device initialization
> path compared to other architectures. Due to this, now pci device probe
> method fails on powerpc system.

s/pci/PCI/ to match below.

> On powerpc systems, struct pci_dev instances are created from device
> tree nodes via of_create_pci_dev(). Because msi_addr_mask was not
> initialized there, it remained zero. Later, during MSI setup,
> msi_verify_entries() validates the programmed MSI address against
> pdev->msi_addr_mask. Since the mask was not set correctly, the
> validation fails, causing PCI driver probe failures for devices on
> powerpc systems.
> 
> Initialize pdev->msi_addr_mask to DMA_BIT_MASK(64) in
> of_create_pci_dev() so that MSI address validation succeeds and device
> probe works as expected.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260129-pci-msi-addr-mask-v4-0-70da998f2750@iscas.ac.cn/
> 
> Fixes: 386ced19e9a3 ("PCI/MSI: Convert the boolean no_64bit_msi flag to a DMA address mask")
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>

Looks like this and a similar sparc fix need to be in v7.0.  Would be
great if they could make v7.0-rc1 (Sunday), but that's pretty close.

Thomas, you merged 386ced19e9a3.  I'm happy to merge the powerpc and
sparc fixes, given acks from you and the powerpc & sparc folks, or
feel free to take them yourself.

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> index 756043dd06e9..26ec97ce6b40 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node *node,
>  	dev->current_state = PCI_UNKNOWN;	/* unknown power state */
>  	dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
>  	dev->dma_mask = 0xffffffff;

It's typical to add a blank line between the code above and the
comment below, as was done in 386ced19e9a3.

> +	/*
> +	 * Assume 64-bit addresses for MSI initially. Will be changed to 32-bit
> +	 * if MSI (rather than MSI-X) capability does not have
> +	 * PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT. Can also be overridden by driver.
> +	 */
> +	dev->msi_addr_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>  
>  	/* Early fixups, before probing the BARs */
>  	pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_early, dev);
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-19 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-17 17:45 [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Initialize msi_addr_mask for OF-created PCI devices Nilay Shroff
2026-02-19  7:22 ` Vivian Wang
2026-02-19 17:32   ` Nilay Shroff
2026-02-19 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-02-19 17:36   ` Nilay Shroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260219173149.GA3486808@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox