From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5CA0F4BB89 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fL8dV60cVz3cdZ; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:36:30 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1771965390; cv=none; b=dVixCidxfi0ALsyi5wxc7zQ2aMbe96unUB5eEyKCPuzCHkkmOUdpLG26CF94N9Y85cwCO/aAatz4O2mvnliLh2EtFD1OkqZ1iXUtP8zDrnhT1coS86Ww4HEicd2rCYwHCgCzLybL4Hy6oGo1YdjDjTPi2dmqP9b3YPmrWgmuhZP6ir8pVuqqzMMQtCo4HGPkCK4TanKPmkiuvclCs+ox7M0PunsmEz8yQ9J6BfSUyjx3/QS1pWNPwDBPRoC1XjMTW7EN+98I3lPlxIdBvsehsEs4vBhx+wFnU9AEQl87KZNBGL4Jgu5YvCCo2FCjRLzbZ3xza/q50BslTlT0FVGx5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1771965390; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=APRPdC8/iEC+tzPbwo+CmGdnsgxx4HawlZ2XzTbQXjI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=eeXzLdDQthDZXx7yH1LdkrQ1VStt9jWjIa+iIDWM+V7a8iuqs5jCTHA7jcckIseqtxjasMH7picEgC50nRDYg6lOmRTnllqhppv1f8fXcC6jpnnSwv7GfGXlUnao69ayP/kYEo8d/8ex/eguCVLrTwKAqcWAGvc1aPc56RpZIdemhLs+vWdLSp4hk7rOKiPoZciRc/kGwqSbINa/+OO4K10yKikYEL78tK0zVATajA7ARb1CbWcJpVhm/VLvd2RuvYnCG0T4uXSaAxQmWr4aRRNGIZZhkxtgQNNiRFYMB+eXUjLV3wFTBdFiFSDisNb4SG29owTdHIDlatlCRaLXog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WG5uczza; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=adubey@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WG5uczza; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=adubey@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fL8dS5z1rz3cdT for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:36:28 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 61OFQjo81361599; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:message-id:mime-version :subject:to; s=pp1; bh=APRPdC8/iEC+tzPbwo+CmGdnsgxx4HawlZ2XzTbQX jI=; b=WG5uczzacVtzJjpWZ6PWDOKTynZSNCZnyHoe1FLAlBXrcfJqHkFRV/oEe 3kFuHIJ3x3Dlq/nWaMmgRUPCSEUXXFgBAuvwwGmQ9n2PqjNtZd+z99U5EiYym9kL UhmxAKctuE/pXVMmyaqe3IwIwnkQg7JfKlXtyhk/ZeDx8o6pkzXOF9K7dz1pvIOj yzYs4qxWUf/OtqSlDJhhaGgLE6VOsRoF1wqSuvPMh4gWWhqam433ZQmFd/UL6qu4 FAPLaBvXZPwaPde5QX12VjzmU371cBxLfDJdGxUMOZLyrAuKkiUdGiAV6h6eIerF 7muSOXC6pl+Wb/gw3o1TN5cDJKnKw== Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4cf34c4vq3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 61OKVINH015764; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:12 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4cfq1sjnac-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:12 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 61OKa8TL56820036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:08 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939FF20040; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1312320043; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ltcrain4-lp15.ltc.tadn.ibm.com (unknown [9.5.7.39]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:06 +0000 (GMT) From: adubey@linux.ibm.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, hbathini@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, Abhishek Dubey Subject: [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/bpf: Add support for verifier selftest Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 20:36:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20260225013627.22098-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwMjI0MDE3MyBTYWx0ZWRfX7bnkhTDL+K7X yPRVoEX00p98hRNjdLQhGdPGv0YCTYZykQJTg8Unc+u6m7DJH9aYViBCu0jDm54S3dNImHym0d+ vNQYpKfU5//Z9zQbra0qxulsBFmkqLkQbjWu21I9CSedgpcd5OvVhPOtpPAc8D12MA3yzIJDxlk q5A/fxk9kp+VqTXOldvy2ZAQOmesdP8A0UavpAesqzXqYsnZdllaFm/QrWKV+Wm5JX++PKmJ2qK 4RwgGjVkAX/4lBZYECozb8iAokbn+wSztWLiHYnjOYf+7TE9SBZHg/YLgERo7EfWytUp2tSxNaJ CBPRhy49OMDP6/rO0suho18308KIkVLouE+5t8uZ6EgujIKFpg/UUa1Y6C0pd4rnhAamNiWr/wa EJ04Dy+6vON4g2PaRFyjgTO9AITgVfpwEnpDlRGmBlZhkRL/tNWbo5mg7XQadbqEMoVgaZCnuPs R3TtaOMtW8gcSLmYbjQ== X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JQF8vhkCSA9f1Z8xvz0zGz7c5V2JE5gD X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=F9lat6hN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=699e0bbd cx=c_pps a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:117 a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:17 a=HzLeVaNsDn8A:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=Mpw57Om8IfrbqaoTuvik:22 a=GgsMoib0sEa3-_RKJdDe:22 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=HhURED8lYQe9u563lhwA:9 X-Proofpoint-GUID: JQF8vhkCSA9f1Z8xvz0zGz7c5V2JE5gD X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.51,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-02-24_02,2026-02-23_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2601150000 definitions=main-2602240173 From: Abhishek Dubey The verifier selftest validates JITed instructions by matching expected disassembly output. The first two patches fix issues in powerpc instruction disassembly that were causing test flow failures. The fix is common for 64-bit & 32-bit powerpc. Add support for the powerpc-specific "__powerpc64" architecture tag in the third patch, enabling proper test filtering in verifier test files. Introduce verifier testcases for tailcalls on powerpc64 in the final patch. Bug Details: ------------ The Long branch stub in the trampoline implementation[1] provides flexibility to handles short as well as long branch distance to actual trampoline. Whereas, the 8 bytes long dummy_tramp_addr field sitting before long branch stub leads to failure when enabling verifier based seltest for ppc64. The verifier selftests require disassembing the final jited image to get native instructions. Later the disassembled instruction sequence is matched against sequence of instructions provided in test-file under __jited() wrapper. The final jited image contains Out-of-line stub and Long branch stub as part of epilogue jitting for a bpf program. The 8 bytes space for dummy_tramp is sandwiched between both above mentioned stubs. These 8 bytes contain memory address of dummy trampoline during trampoline invocation which don't correspond to any powerpc instructions. So, disassembly fails resulting in failure of verifier selftests. The following code snippet shows the problem with current arrangement made for dummy_tramp_addr. /* Out-of-line stub */ mflr r0 [b|bl] tramp mtlr r0 //only with OOL b bpf_func + 4 /* Long branch stub */ .long <---Invalid bytes sequence, disassembly fails mflr r11 bcl 20,31,$+4 mflr r12 ld r12, -8-SZL(r12) mtctr r12 mtlr r11 //retain ftrace ABI bctr Consider test program binary of size 112 bytes: 0: 00000060 10004de8 00002039 f8ff21f9 81ff21f8 7000e1fb 3000e13b 28: 3000e13b 2a006038 f8ff7ff8 00000039 7000e1eb 80002138 7843037d 56: 2000804e a602087c 00000060 a603087c bcffff4b c0341d00 000000c0 84: a602687d 05009f42 a602887d f0ff8ce9 a603897d a603687d 2004804e Disassembly output of above binary for ppc64le: pc:0 left:112 00 00 00 60 : nop pc:4 left:108 10 00 4d e8 : ld 2, 16(13) pc:8 left:104 00 00 20 39 : li 9, 0 pc:12 left:100 f8 ff 21 f9 : std 9, -8(1) pc:16 left:96 81 ff 21 f8 : stdu 1, -128(1) pc:20 left:92 70 00 e1 fb : std 31, 112(1) pc:24 left:88 30 00 e1 3b : addi 31, 1, 48 pc:28 left:84 30 00 e1 3b : addi 31, 1, 48 pc:32 left:80 2a 00 60 38 : li 3, 42 pc:36 left:76 f8 ff 7f f8 : std 3, -8(31) pc:40 left:72 00 00 00 39 : li 8, 0 pc:44 left:68 70 00 e1 eb : ld 31, 112(1) pc:48 left:64 80 00 21 38 : addi 1, 1, 128 pc:52 left:60 78 43 03 7d : mr 3, 8 pc:56 left:56 20 00 80 4e : blr pc:60 left:52 a6 02 08 7c : mflr 0 pc:64 left:48 00 00 00 60 : nop pc:68 left:44 a6 03 08 7c : mtlr 0 pc:72 left:40 bc ff ff 4b : b .-68 pc:76 left:36 c0 34 1d 00 : ... Failure log: Can't disasm instruction at offset 76: c0 34 1d 00 00 00 00 c0 a6 02 68 7d 05 00 9f 42 -------------------------------------- Observation: Can't disasm instruction at offset 76 as this address has ".long " (0xc0341d00000000c0) But valid instructions follow at offset 84 onwards. Move the long branch address space to the bottom of the long branch stub. This allows uninterrupted disassembly until the last 8 bytes. Exclude these last bytes from the overall program length to prevent failure in assembly generation. Following is disassembler output for same test program with moved down dummy_tramp_addr field: ..... ..... pc:68 left:44 a6 03 08 7c : mtlr 0 pc:72 left:40 bc ff ff 4b : b .-68 pc:76 left:36 a6 02 68 7d : mflr 11 pc:80 left:32 05 00 9f 42 : bcl 20, 31, .+4 pc:84 left:28 a6 02 88 7d : mflr 12 pc:88 left:24 14 00 8c e9 : ld 12, 20(12) pc:92 left:20 a6 03 89 7d : mtctr 12 pc:96 left:16 a6 03 68 7d : mtlr 11 pc:100 left:12 20 04 80 4e : bctr pc:104 left:8 c0 34 1d 00 : Failure log: Can't disasm instruction at offset 104: c0 34 1d 00 00 00 00 c0 --------------------------------------- Disassembly logic can truncate at 104, ignoring last 8 bytes. Update the dummy_tramp_addr field offset calculation from the end of the program to reflect its new location, for bpf_arch_text_poke() to update the actual trampoline's address in this field. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030070850.1361304-18-hbathini@linux.ibm.com/ Abhishek Dubey (4): powerpc/bpf: Move out dummy_tramp_addr after Long branch stub selftest/bpf: Fixing powerpc JIT disassembly failure selftest/bpf: Enable verifier selftest for powerpc64 selftest/bpf: Add tailcall verifier selftest for powerpc64 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 45 +++++++++--- .../selftests/bpf/jit_disasm_helpers.c | 13 +++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 1 + .../bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall_jit.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 5 ++ 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.52.0