From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A2DEF8FF4 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 15:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fQx8k5zC6z3bp0; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 02:16:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2001:8b0:10b:1236::1" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1772637398; cv=none; b=EGJIf7+92MgY9AmYaOAkz+gWHUifRL6x/GN5pDcjEX4nYDcZ6WmHUwfNxrm0tF7GsmW8v36yjwiZd6vrxuVT1NGGGp2S99UIk9HdNPH5Ho+gR+njSc4ndOjy1LjHVTA/E+I3a2fVG+ZRVDKrYQZqAPX2NGJT35mHrH/zYoa509yfGv+XN2ysrGJHV8/oPQGFVmbDw4MqKY/ctceh8MaaambTvbccRsp/A5nFz4dLVKs1IExu5S+k9Vq4C8jhmWH9fs5w7N2MfTv2bz2GrHNpzBEa3hWd90PY2jxmdHb6U5GKGmPJGgThfEPQj6ddzBEShlfhVw/mDRcB2BjWgBpv1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1772637398; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=6YOM2WbXA6Qkgtapqxkvfve9MfkbbU3JEb7qOmomVt8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kYF+OqqF9Wj/AFRVHwWcYySQAlFpifQ9E59nLJYTt7uoWKmew+PGp2DsvvgCaoxxSvGBEC1LToNmYPZ2N/7VGqMNWWz4gDC+QRg1zlERgJUYiVKIA6tm73RdI1XBAEXbkJn9bkuRjIWQ6sAbjVwdqOeTCgUowq/BaJ3yDczQ72Yq4BwU/wyM8lsHVow1aVnUbYnouDnHxLNlsSJ0Qb4wytllwKsvwsPVn2LYsFOEoTuUAx+LajTeTPDBRbdLbFtIg6nKSYP5Q8S7mZdbSVtVK8nHsKnWlW8Q0PfCgXY7djtt9w8Q9DZkdMyxaYTLjOVe9Kg0Cr/cOcQOkw1iyzxLEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=q1J4oN1p; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=none (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1236::1; helo=casper.infradead.org; envelope-from=peterz@infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=q1J4oN1p; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1236::1; helo=casper.infradead.org; envelope-from=peterz@infradead.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fQx8h5Rhnz2yY0 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2026 02:16:35 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=6YOM2WbXA6Qkgtapqxkvfve9MfkbbU3JEb7qOmomVt8=; b=q1J4oN1pPBSexJBFfjtr2VdcfT cPjNy395v4gDWuxsi/ha9yDNRWUDE6LFqfzn4Yd1LrI2S8TpWPL9z3MhAmoIER+ZDJyxwPon5M1aZ AskUH2Doi34eCDyGezZO7dFjB0MasMnhHu+waAlY2mSgI1X8HVcdj0ldXYJVqOQJGTHaRlrHebAgJ 7wxEvMsC0Uv8vstvbUoelynHMruTuwwfR7BfY5x5rRwbRWYnr5u0aOyOekToDV4C2BditkWs1U/DG GZMgOgAqSwHzeMa0C5li6urfh2f+Xx0KFGH88a+OERM2YwXtwihCtup0aktg8uAV14j68e34o5DP6 1F2fSdZQ==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vxnwz-0000000DTMB-31pq; Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:15:49 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20C7A300FB6; Wed, 04 Mar 2026 16:15:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:15:48 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Biggers , Andrew Morton , Richard Henderson , Matt Turner , Magnus Lindholm , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , "David S. Miller" , Andreas Larsson , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Herbert Xu , Dan Williams , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Arnd Bergmann , Song Liu , Yu Kuai , Li Nan , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/25] xor: assert that xor_blocks is not called from interrupt context Message-ID: <20260304151548.GN1395266@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20260226151106.144735-1-hch@lst.de> <20260226151106.144735-2-hch@lst.de> <20260227142455.GG1282955@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20260303160050.GB7021@lst.de> <20260303195517.GC2846@sol> <20260304145134.GA21983@lst.de> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260304145134.GA21983@lst.de> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > How about "WARN_ON_ONCE(!preemptible())"? I think that covers the union > > of the context restrictions correctly. (Compared to in_task(), it > > handles the cases where hardirqs or softirqs are disabled.) > > Good enough I guess. Peter? Sure. The only caveat with that is that for PREEMPT_COUNT=n this might not work, it unconditionally returns 0.