From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CAE106703C for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fWrqV5737z3cG5; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:18:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=172.105.4.254 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1773328726; cv=none; b=O4bdfrmd7acm1VR95xjdob0XRwehGwYrGycgMjg+SkjMjZsoUdYrneoB/eO6TeEPa7XiIZYacxMIbbeG/hV1MaV0ceHJ0nOEMQN4LGa/xtvlt6u3nR7Aj6z0MV/GfdzV7RaAXy+I0zxNulz+shNX4dgvFErKcM0jDHSyfsOrUcJeaj4gVZi4Qu7e+49ReaVr+SRCsoonJCRqACX8Ls0oesmdFuVquM0Hmh3uZqKlZwLroDG6EcO5TED5akR3qSgp8a5ZzWmv0zvLyKxFw8Gv9aNxwZ/9+R/DTDVVgJXphwLEhDWsJewffXsZdc+8SRpC9dGDZRj/60Vi7Ko2oUQOag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1773328726; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=hRkr9tlQtutDgkuphlYmn7fRBgJ/GwVX/ag0J9/X/gI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eI2LxVpPQj4FJH0xlSP1G6JbdRuz/vXR9L2tpBTtkX07TRhJc7ises5LxL0viBKe6XItGsrJQJCTs8nYXm1nM2pY4UjDn951OTlw2T4tDi+iamoKI5JQrg8MBSlzi0XLVx215z6B5YpCPPaB0ZwiCG3+2/6+xA2woIjKTa2B6Embgd1WAIarWaYwVgqx8n8x9pb4xqGp8L+h1XT8RTOEIEOIl3ccYa7U3yExXwT8LqVH1orP2akd4v3jUAMy7HQ1yYhC71M1KMM+2GtKAGdby59JtBKvBr0VSjsAW1nz8OCJSMDUMlAV5+Pb2CqFIyM5qW5c5uN8mIkdXjLBwzOTsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=V1k65cmJ; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=172.105.4.254; helo=tor.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=V1k65cmJ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=172.105.4.254; helo=tor.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fWrqT5GjQz3c9r for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:18:45 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4452960142; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24701C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:18:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1773328722; bh=RU7mCgn4p4aFt4z17AtB/HzQEKVXpAiuBbfZS5Sysa4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V1k65cmJmmo+ZdpjbsNZv8nsCPVPi61VKALCKXZeOdH3/KVdSz+l5mdTs2j4pTFLz TjGA79gCGU23W5C90XwC6e0xdRba2zTRj0weRhQoxKvJs12V/HeNxVa41VKe9AjWPv fXDGMebsWeyd/6rYWviq9pQAuQImG1jFn3xPJpkk= Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:18:38 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Rob Herring , Bartosz Golaszewski , Saravana Kannan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Frank Li , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, driver-core@lists.linux.dev, Peng Fan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] soc: remove direct accesses to of_root from drivers/soc/ Message-ID: <2026031231-whiff-speculate-805a@gregkh> References: <20260223-soc-of-root-v2-0-b45da45903c8@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260224183832.GB3239922-robh@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:28:26AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 7:38 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 02:37:15PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > linux/of.h declares a set of variables providing addresses of certain > > > key OF nodes. The pointers being variables can't profit from stubs > > > provided for when CONFIG_OF is disabled which means that drivers > > > accessing these variables can't profit from CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y > > > coverage. > > > > > > There are drivers under drivers/soc/ that access the of_root node. This > > > series introduces new OF helpers for reading the machine compatible and > > > model strings, exports an existing SoC helper that reads the machine > > > string from the root node and finally replaces all direct accesses to > > > of_root with new or already existing helper functions. > > > > > > Merging strategy: first two patches should be either acked by Rob or > > > picked up into an immutable branch based on v7.0-rc1, the rest can go > > > through the SoC tree. > > > > SoC tree is good. > > > > For all but patch 8, > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) > > > > FYI Rob also reviewed patch 8 now. Who would pick the patches up? Greg > KH? There does not seem to be a centralized SoC maintainer in > MAINTAINERS? Sure, let me take them now, thanks. greg k-h