From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/dt_cpu_ftrs: Set CPU_FTR_P11_PVR for Power11 and later processors
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:04:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260614173437.26352-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
When using device tree CPU features (dt-cpu-ftrs), the kernel bypasses
the traditional cputable-based CPU identification and instead derives
CPU features from the device tree's "ibm,powerpc-cpu-features" node
provided by firmware.
However, CPU_FTR_P11_PVR is a kernel-internal feature flag used to
identify Power11 and later processors, and is not represented in the
device tree's ISA feature set. While ISA v3.1 support (indicated by
CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) is present on both Power10 and Power11, the
CPU_FTR_P11_PVR flag is specifically needed by code that must
distinguish between Power10 and Power11 processors.
Without this flag set, code that checks for Power11 using
cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR) will incorrectly return false on
Power11+ systems using dt-cpu-ftrs, leading to incorrect behavior.
This issue manifests specifically in powernv environments (bare-metal
or QEMU TCG with powernv machine type), where skiboot/OPAL firmware
provides the "ibm,powerpc-cpu-features" node, causing the kernel to
use dt-cpu-ftrs. The issue does not affect pseries guests, where SLOF
firmware does not provide this node, causing the kernel to fall back
to the traditional cputable path (identify_cpu) which correctly sets
CPU_FTR_P11_PVR during PVR-based CPU identification.
In powernv TCG guests, the missing flag causes KVM code to trigger
warnings when attempting to create KVM guests, as cpu_features shows
0x000c00eb8f4fb187 (missing bit 53) instead of the correct
0x002c00eb8f4fb187 (with bit 53 set).
Fix this by setting CPU_FTR_P11_PVR for all processors with
PVR >= PVR_POWER11 when ISA v3.1 support is detected in
cpufeatures_setup_start(). This approach ensures forward
compatibility with future processor generations.
Fixes: 96e266e3bcd6 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add Power11 capability support for Nested PAPR guests")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
---
Related: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609053327.61563-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
index 3af6c06af02f..e5853daa6a48 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -704,6 +704,15 @@ static void __init cpufeatures_setup_start(u32 isa)
if (isa >= ISA_V3_1) {
cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_ARCH_31;
cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features2 |= PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1;
+
+ /*
+ * CPU_FTR_P11_PVR is a kernel-internal flag to identify
+ * Power11 and later processors. While ISA v3.1 is supported
+ * by Power10+, this flag specifically indicates Power11+
+ * for code that needs to distinguish between P10 and P11.
+ */
+ if (PVR_VER(mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >= PVR_POWER11)
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_P11_PVR;
}
}
base-commit: 424280953322cf66314f3ba5e2d1ef345f21c770
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-14 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-14 17:34 Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-06-16 5:26 ` [PATCH] powerpc/dt_cpu_ftrs: Set CPU_FTR_P11_PVR for Power11 and later processors Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-06-16 5:39 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-16 6:38 ` Amit Machhiwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260614173437.26352-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox