From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:31:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623182912.8ad606a1-ea-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878q8bcbh6.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com>
Hi Vaibhav,
Thanks for revewing this patch. My response is inline.
On 2026/06/19 11:34 AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Hi Amit.
>
> Thanks for the patch and incorporating V3 review comments. Further
> review comments inline below:
>
> Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On POWER systems, the host CPU may run in a compatibility mode (e.g., a
> > Power11 processor operating in Power10 compatibility mode). In such
> > cases, the effective CPU level exposed to guests differs from the
> > physical processor generation.
> >
> > When running nested KVM guests, QEMU derives the host CPU type using
> > mfpvr(), which reflects the physical processor version. This can result
> > in a mismatch between the CPU model selected by QEMU and the
> > compatibility mode enforced by the host, leading to guest boot failures.
> >
> > For example, booting a nested guest on a Power11 LPAR configured in
> > Power10 compatibility mode fails with:
> >
> > KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
> > [..KVM reg dump..]
> >
> > This occurs because QEMU selects a CPU model corresponding to the
> > physical processor (via mfpvr()), while the host operates in a lower
> > compatibility mode. As a result, KVM rejects the requested compatibility
> > level during guest initialization.
> >
> > Add support for retrieving host CPU compatibility capabilities for
> > nested guests on PowerVM (PAPR nested API v2). The hypervisor provides
> > the effective compatibility levels via the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES
> > hcall, which reflects the processor modes negotiated between the Power
> > hypervisor (L0) and the host partition (L1).
> >
> > On pseries systems, obtain the capability bitmap using
> > plpar_guest_get_capabilities() and return it via struct
> > kvm_ppc_compat_caps. The implementation defines KVM-specific capability
> > constants (KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9/10/11) and applies masking to ensure
> > only supported processor modes are exposed to userspace. This information
> > is then exposed through the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl.
> >
> > Hook the implementation into the Book3S HV kvmppc_ops so that it can be
> > invoked by the generic KVM ioctl handling code.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > index 8a38be6c3b03..730488681443 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > @@ -443,7 +443,16 @@ struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps {
> > __u64 size; /* Size of this structure */
> > __u64 compat_capabilities; /* Capabilities supported by the host */
> > };
> > -
> > +/*
> > + * Capability bits for compat_capabilities field in kvm_ppc_compat_caps.
> > + * These bits indicate which processor compatibility modes are supported.
> > + */
> > +#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9 (1ULL << 62)
> > +#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10 (1ULL << 61)
> > +#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11 (1ULL << 60)
> > +#define KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK (KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9 | \
> > + KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10 | \
> > + KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11)
> > /*
> > * Values for character and character_mask.
> > * These are identical to the values used by H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS.
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> > index f9380ef65750..f674386df62c 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> > @@ -6523,6 +6523,22 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +static int kvmppc_get_compat_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long capabilities = 0;
> > + long rc = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
> > + if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2())
> > + rc = plpar_guest_get_capabilities(0,
> > &capabilities);
> I think instead of making the hcall you should use the
> 'nested_capabilities' extern symbol as it would already the same
> value. This symbol is already accessible in 'book3s_hv.c'
Agreed! Will change to use nested_capabilities directly instead of
making the hcall. This is more efficient as this will help reduce an
hcall overhead while the value is already cached during module
initialization (in kvmhv_nested_init()).
Thanks,
Amit
>
> > + host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities &
> > + KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
> > .get_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs_hv,
> > .set_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs_hv,
> > @@ -6565,6 +6581,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
> > .hash_v3_possible = kvmppc_hash_v3_possible,
> > .create_vcpu_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs_hv,
> > .create_vm_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vm_debugfs_hv,
> > + .get_compat_caps = kvmppc_get_compat_caps,
> > };
> >
> > static int kvm_init_subcore_bitmap(void)
> > --
> > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
> >
> >
>
> --
> Cheers
> ~ Vaibhav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 12:33 [PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: PPC: Expose CPU compatibility modes for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 12:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and wire up ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-19 6:14 ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-06-23 11:11 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 12:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-19 6:04 ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-06-23 13:01 ` Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-06-16 12:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-19 6:12 ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-06-23 13:31 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 12:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-19 6:14 ` Vaibhav Jain
2026-06-23 14:05 ` Amit Machhiwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623182912.8ad606a1-ea-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox