From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379A0C5CFDB for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hM61m430Nz2yRP; Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:42:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1786722172; cv=none; b=PS8s4tA6C4rOqevDEKak/W3kJ5EeC+BSOOBBIcBDTchTksEij5MJTX1wtnzz7bPcAMJV4DQDZP81jRkWj7Gtyk/gHNXyXaoWHpKC1g2HRyp5C5fsDuCTNUtJBKmpaLIeER3juiXgXmHCm0C9TuP+VIFO2PXZKsT+alWts4MK6FpyH5SaUytZL1IkONDjygkyEphjdiWGy6meT2o0ObFzNYthJxY2Z1E9tos+1kyPgFAGZcnamiYSw6FGeFC8IEBTFhA/uH2lefWbc+BY/dc+tiWlxwNqp5RmpU4/e1cTaSmLJzxIHC/Z8oLqdhyG7S804p8QKjktpc7XnlI4DkVrFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1786722172; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=HrCq79AU+KgQBc3hczsRFI1XL6XhXT4TgvuRbwKh7uI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=doNNfsngDBDWbIxTp1+YqbK8xfLKyIfTx/AMfESDAJOxaO9YXYXo3ER4P0Gx+RZV0TzJ974FMOAnoMFATVJBVFmV+UO3/DyBgoir9wRgPWRZYgl5E4DFO25QD1d87YvHyG5CS52O+FWgpcMJOskv2WpMWwd0V46/r+CA2nzv6Mo4rmyWgl56cmvQhhXWN8PTQohcO5hrURR3mIbnxxYzNq2ZFO4QtZ/5tXMJ/DpYmCmZaL9mpJ7Q5hOivFWYr95rfPL8ZSc5vubBb1UvjgVDLrZ1jV5RVYHaVdx/6dN/5ncsZYAkmaNnA7p11R6b4DAN3LVEe56DxtgpS+hNI4bJDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=TwPSHGZP; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=192.198.163.13; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=TwPSHGZP; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=192.198.163.13; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hM61h3mRmz2y8G for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:42:46 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786722169; x=1818258169; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=fxbnJdrTRr0um+4aluXhGRJ2r0C9VsyrarcgZbWR7PM=; b=TwPSHGZPFU6g4Eje9XOeF/k9PEowToBg0Hv5LztJtjMbpPLCAQE2ToQE 9FI/xvjOVMS0aQStTeDYYuiPXfzve42tOjn33wODdrcSzwXtWMy4Aajz1 fEyY9khTAkzCdoLcLQoEcZ2+eYjrDJtUdyoRCTppT1cfRSFgg3+ihIIC+ qd0htdAuxMsM4ivSq78lA3oxjuD7eCFHXr3xaiXiPqyetp+j6m1wGS2F9 4TRs9b4JnpGOBYXudRyfrt47wn+Vw3pWC69jin7rRzvcFl5ygLo0ihwgK w/6E4pPjlISQvIPtaxpcBN9Yzj0b5DxjKJZZBcHfa48S2AwHKR0QiYpJU g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: i+hJ3dfHTTuztdmcRIhuVg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Wlqzv/3gREekWSjujB6xrw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11875"; a="89820548" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,222,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="89820548" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Aug 2026 08:42:42 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IGYQR30JQT2Ruf8uvJmfew== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uof/TsuUTduvQU8tZcs3HQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,222,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="260468820" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 6eda058d650d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Aug 2026 08:42:40 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 6eda058d650d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wuu3J-00000000ZQY-2zpm; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:42:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:42:18 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Zigotzky , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "(open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC \\(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\\))" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c. Message-ID: <202608142355.4AeDorvg-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260701125941.906-2-chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260701125941.906-2-chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] [also build test WARNING on powerpc/fixes linus/master v7.2-rc7 next-20260813] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Zigotzky/Connecting-the-SB600-s-i8259-controller-rather-in-pasemi-s-pci-c-than-in-pasemi-s-setup-c/20260813-054214 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260701125941.906-2-chzigotzky%40xenosoft.de patch subject: [PATCH] Connecting the SB600's i8259 controller rather in pasemi's pci.c than in pasemi's setup.c. config: powerpc64-randconfig-r052-20260814 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/202608142355.4AeDorvg-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260814/202608142355.4AeDorvg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608142355.4AeDorvg-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c:217:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'nemo_init_IRQ' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 217 | void nemo_init_IRQ(void) | ^ arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c:217:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 217 | void nemo_init_IRQ(void) | ^ | static 1 warning generated. vim +/nemo_init_IRQ +217 arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c 216 > 217 void nemo_init_IRQ(void) 218 { 219 struct device_node *np; 220 int gpio_virq; 221 struct mpic *mpic; 222 223 /* Connect the SB600's legacy i8259 controller */ 224 np = of_find_node_by_path("/pxp@0,e0000000"); 225 i8259_init(np, 0); 226 of_node_put(np); 227 228 gpio_virq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, 3); 229 irq_set_irq_type(gpio_virq, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH); 230 irq_set_chained_handler(gpio_virq, sb600_8259_cascade); 231 mpic_unmask_irq(irq_get_irq_data(gpio_virq)); 232 233 mpic = irq_get_chip_data(gpio_virq); 234 irq_set_default_domain(mpic->irqhost); 235 } 236 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki