From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: early boot crash in init_tracer_tracefs
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:19:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930010555.da0b1682-03-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aruso0aJ4lsrERTb@kunlun.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
Thanks for sharing the host information and the full guest boot log.
On 2026/09/29 02:18 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 04:39:05PM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > On 2026/09/29 01:04 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 09:36:05AM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > > > On 2026/09/28 11:43 AM, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > > > > Hi Michal,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the report. We have been looking at the crash and have some findings
> > > > > and follow-up questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2026/09/25 10:10 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There appears to be a regression between
> > > >
> > > > < snip >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linux 7.0.12
> > > > > > https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/tree/4c9922875554ec191166ba6c0145f12d8ff9d4fc
> > > > > > https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel-source/blob/2ebf0bc/config/ppc64le/default
> > > >
> > > > I have been trying to recreate the issue with this kernel and config but I
> > > > haven't been able to. The L2 KVM guest boots fine everytime.
> > > >
> > > > In addition to the requested information, could you please also share your qemu
> > > > cmdline/guest xml you used?
> > >
> > > The XML of the VM is below. What other information do you require?
> >
> > Thanks for sharing the guest XML. I had requested some more info [1]. Could
> > you please share that?
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260928111234.faec09f7-8d-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Hello,
>
> full log below.
>
> host:
>
> numactl --hardware
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
> node 0 size: 122139 MB
> node 0 free: 103635 MB
> node 1 cpus: 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
> node 1 size: 139516 MB
> node 1 free: 128483 MB
> node distances:
> node 0 1
> 0: 10 20
> 1: 20 10
>
> The patch does indeed make it possible to boot when the buffer
> allocation fails.
Glad the first fix works. That fixes the crash (the NULL deref in
__find_event_file()), but the ring buffer allocation failure itself is a
separate bug worth fixing too.
My suspicion is that with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=y, si_mem_available()
returns falsely negative during early boot because NR_FREE_PAGES only reflects
the non-deferred memory pool at that point — the bulk of RAM hasn't been handed
to the buddy allocator yet. The check in __rb_allocate_pages() rejects the
allocation prematurely.
[ 0.149312][ T743] node 0 deferred pages initialised in 20ms
Since the issue is not recreating on my environment, could you please give this
patch a try and see if the actual crash goes away?
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 04bb94c29f58..224cc0e5c066 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ static int __rb_allocate_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* not going to succeed.
*/
i = si_mem_available();
- if (i < nr_pages)
+ if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING && i < nr_pages)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
Thanks,
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 8:10 early boot crash in init_tracer_tracefs Michal Suchánek
2026-09-28 6:13 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 4:06 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 11:04 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-09-29 11:09 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 12:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-09-29 19:49 ` Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-09-30 10:46 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-10-09 16:51 ` Amit Machhiwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930010555.da0b1682-03-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox