From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 018CECA5FCE for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hwnNM0wMbz2y2T; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:56:51 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=172.234.252.31 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1790895411; cv=none; b=mr3nAJH+A41kK0/hP9j92zZdbAI5fdHAaBxefNzn3myou9Eg4Uz6nr0SRI5ZjngcfWXORfBawa35fcMqTtQunRJyws35YI8KmWoD7InMFXkJ0wv3Fg+WrUI2cAzmpGasVRNJvoxWfefU0PbO8LV5FJRGZRkAckihoQKDrEb+ms4Kzojk6YQYkEircMxGoHfJH3WlchqClm3n/qqdWpDSiZCTK4UqSGz3S/y2Bv9dqspmw8KvSBZ+v/APCejOTrnafp6i1CDNershzdfXi0H89ckuZp40vBENsDugVRL+R74/eYzwgTQuB1nmIUcXoQssMpznULYzh2Y+UoVgoBW7/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1790895411; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=H8NFaTMuZbQ4YKm+CogUMym7Z14eCXyyMrAw+sva1Es=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OE50C1oKwBvbX5f5gHaqLHzpFjuSnoVPTxHkauVVXXJXAg0uJgGz/QTldpaj+QepcQIYQGbs9mGATO84vOJw8AlOO0Wdi70xHLO3Dcm77L527fluRbuD7RTrFXLyvEzuhytEMt56izdaD0KLnz5h8q2f8w1zdm4huuDOHfq3eDle+udhir5ShSlsjLlUVT/GKUdbdLE9n+6j5cJpei7zmiKwnfCTxPFhZuJV03nH0yhbdgryIZgdOXLSvAWAirMZE+iSQk7/qUHoXDwsY7Fs0QgfhIXQ8vPGCVPAiMB2qFEtmdCROyuLbxSOP5w6B/3+CNmlzIaXUnOvnPBvtDDNtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JnE+3Z6G; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=172.234.252.31; helo=sea.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=JnE+3Z6G; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=172.234.252.31; helo=sea.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hwnNL1wsPz2xwN for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:56:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA14641224; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A8951F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:56:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790895407; bh=H8NFaTMuZbQ4YKm+CogUMym7Z14eCXyyMrAw+sva1Es=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=JnE+3Z6GNVm4dkQp3Ky/Wr4oZb5HPnSFOFhIClfGdM9SlKUX5c2p1Q0cpIZVd3rub 1c0tvtQ8tuWFksgkmAWABr9k9yZ7gBu9uaXgFFiF0mzpDDE83FzLcVce6z7alwCy6M 7Efmo8o1IjdqOme2j5gu5TUFRKJUgxgq9ucVim0VA9kaVebusUxmSs9qpeDM7bnn++ V/9k1F7tSaJaaCX/QNwNcO5JEVN02lz8Qtun9/idy+OilA8fyG2zTLmU2Ze9Hm23F7 ESxrF0h1t6jVDzrxCIKx17MLH/pSzBAKOZlR55NCdsmmWjno4sLotxQunMnlVVB+0T kg/4L13IM75Dg== Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:56:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: mingming cao Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, horms@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, nnac123@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, haren@linux.ibm.com, ricklind@linux.ibm.com, davemarq@linux.ibm.com, bjking1@linux.ibm.com, shaik.abdulla1@ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 00/15] ibmveth: Add multi-queue RX support Message-ID: <20261001155646.5957a373@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <966a8145-421e-4be1-8d46-2cf8e4f9fa2a@linux.ibm.com> References: <966a8145-421e-4be1-8d46-2cf8e4f9fa2a@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 10:40:56 -0700 mingming cao wrote: > Hi Jacub, There's no c in my name, sir. I wonder why people do that. > I noticed this v7 series is flagged red on patchwork. The apply failure=20 > is due to a dependency on my own [PATCH net 0/2] (Message-ID:=20 > cover.1790357373.git.mmc@linux.ibm.com) sent the same day =E2=80=94 kept= =20 > separate per your earlier feedback to peel fixes out of feature series.=20 > Both touch ibmveth_open() in the same region, and the net pair is not=20 > yet in net-next. >=20 > The v7 MQ series is based on net-next 161ea2d4f2a7 (2026-09-24). The=20 > fixes are already subsumed by MQ patches 3 and 6. >=20 > Shall I wait and rebase MQ once the net pair lands in net-next, or send=20 > a v8 now with the net pair folded in? Happy to do either. Sorry for the delay, hint: please put just me in the To: if you want me to spot the email sooner. We get 400+ messages to the list every day, I'm only reading the list as I review :( To answer your question - please hold off with reposting until the fixes are in net-next. We won't merge the patches if they conflict with fixes.