From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6455EDDFED for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:50:00 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7EA18FDD2DC2154AA3BD6D2F22A62A0E5F6A11@zch01exm23.fsl.freescale.net> References: <1173300525.23776.136.camel@ld0161-tx32> <7EA18FDD2DC2154AA3BD6D2F22A62A0E5F6A11@zch01exm23.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <20303D6D-C19A-4BDB-B540-9994AC538642@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move 8641 PCI-Express to arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pcie.c. Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:49:54 -0600 To: "Zang Roy-r61911" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: >> This move sets the stage for the use of generic PCI Express >> code in 85xx and 86xx parts from FSL. Subsequent patches for >> 8548 and 8544 will be able to use this shared code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger >> Acked-by: Andy Fleming >> --- >> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 5 +++++ >> arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Makefile | 2 +- >> arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile | 1 + >> .../86xx/mpc86xx_pcie.c => sysdev/fsl_pcie.c} | 2 -- >> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename >> arch/powerpc/{platforms/86xx/mpc86xx_pcie.c => >> sysdev/fsl_pcie.c} (100%) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index 6dfbd52..f68de20 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ config PPC_86xx >> bool "Freescale 86xx" >> select 6xx >> select FSL_SOC >> + select FSL_PCIE >> select PPC_FPU >> select ALTIVEC >> help >> @@ -1022,6 +1023,10 @@ config SBUS >> config FSL_SOC >> bool >> >> +config FSL_PCIE >> + bool >> + depends on PPC_86xx >> + > How about 8548 with pcie? There isn't any in tree 85xx user of PCIe at this point. - k