From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
K Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: powerpc/perf: hw breakpoints return ENOSPC
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:17:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20344.1345115849@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345102812.31459.114.camel@twins>
Peter,
> > On this second syscall, fetch_bp_busy_slots() sets slots.pinned to be 1,
> > despite there being no breakpoint on this CPU. This is because the call
> > the task_bp_pinned, checks all CPUs, rather than just the current CPU.
> > POWER7 only has one hardware breakpoint per CPU (ie. HBP_NUM=1), so we
> > return ENOSPC.
>
> I think this comes from the ptrace legacy, we register a breakpoint on
> all cpus because when we migrate a task it cannot fail to migrate the
> breakpoint.
>
> Its one of the things I hate most about the hwbp stuff as it relates to
> perf.
>
> Frederic knows more...
Maybe I should wait for Frederic to respond but I'm not sure I
understand what you're saying.
I can see how using ptrace hw breakpoints and perf hw breakpoints at the
same time could be a problem, but I'm not sure how this would stop it.
Are you saying that we need to keep at least 1 slot free at all times,
so that we can use it for ptrace?
Is "perf record -e mem:0x10000000 true" ever going to be able to work on
POWER7 with only one hw breakpoint resource per CPU?
Thanks,
Mikey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-16 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-16 4:23 powerpc/perf: hw breakpoints return ENOSPC Michael Neuling
2012-08-16 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-16 11:17 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2012-08-16 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-16 14:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2012-08-16 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-17 1:20 ` Michael Ellerman
2012-08-16 23:34 ` Michael Neuling
2012-08-17 16:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-17 21:58 ` Michael Neuling
2012-09-25 7:10 ` Michael Neuling
2012-09-27 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-27 1:02 ` Jovi Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20344.1345115849@neuling.org \
--to=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).