From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set cpu explicitly in kernel compiles
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:44:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <205f4a46b0d9eddd5c46ff1678c9e4ca@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17017.44421.790813.918463@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
> Well, say you are compiling for 405. You either need to have a gcc
> that was configured with --with-cpu=405, or you need to have hacked
> arch/ppc/Makefile to add -mcpu=405. In both cases the problem doesn't
> arise. It only arises if you have a biarch gcc4 that was configured
> without any --with-cpu=xxx option and is run without any -mcpu=xxx
> option.
It happens for any installation where the default chosen by the GCC
used is not the -mcpu=XXX flag you need used for your kernel. Which
is a much more general statement than the biarch one. Most people just
get lucky, because they compile code with a compiler that is defaulted
for their target, and userland and kernel use (about) the same options
on most targets. Not so in biarch land (bleeech).
> If you think we should have -mcpu=xxx on the command line for 4xx,
> 44x, 8xx, etc., then that's fine, but that is a separate problem from
> what my patch was addressing (one which my patch might make it easier
> to fix, though).
Please always use -mcpu=XXX (and perhaps -mtune=XXX), that's the only
"correct" way to fix this. Or _never_ do any -mcpu=, and let users
override it in the CC setting in the Makefile. But I like the first
option better.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-06 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 7:05 [PATCH] Set cpu explicitly in kernel compiles Paul Mackerras
2005-05-04 11:28 ` Dan Malek
2005-05-04 15:34 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-04 16:06 ` Chris Friesen
2005-05-04 21:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-04 23:21 ` Dan Malek
2005-05-05 4:00 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-05 4:12 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-05 4:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-05 4:47 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-05 5:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-05-05 12:24 ` Dan Malek
2005-05-05 14:00 ` Kumar Gala
2005-05-05 14:23 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-05 15:12 ` Kumar Gala
2005-05-05 15:27 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-05 16:22 ` Kumar Gala
2005-05-05 16:29 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-06 14:44 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2005-05-06 14:53 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-06 15:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2005-05-06 15:34 ` Tom Rini
2005-05-06 15:47 ` Kumar Gala
2005-05-05 12:12 ` Dan Malek
2005-05-04 13:45 ` Kumar Gala
2005-05-04 15:28 ` Tom Rini
2005-07-03 17:29 ` Olaf Hering
2005-07-03 18:32 ` Tom Rini
2005-07-05 18:14 ` Olaf Hering
2005-07-05 19:47 ` Tom Rini
2005-07-05 19:54 ` Olaf Hering
2005-07-05 19:58 ` Tom Rini
2005-07-05 20:17 ` Olaf Hering
2005-07-05 20:27 ` Olaf Hering
2005-07-05 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2005-07-06 6:38 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-02 19:40 ` Olaf Hering
2006-04-06 4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-04-11 18:42 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=205f4a46b0d9eddd5c46ff1678c9e4ca@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).