linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:00:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2073294c-8003-451a-93e0-9aab81de4d22@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015082727.2395128-8-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>

[...]


> 
> In summary (count/enabled represent the values *after* the call):
> 
> lazy_mmu_mode_enable()		-> arch_enter()	    count=1 enabled=1
>      lazy_mmu_mode_enable()	-> ø		    count=2 enabled=1
> 	lazy_mmu_mode_pause()	-> arch_leave()     count=2 enabled=0

The arch_leave..() is expected to do a flush itself, correct?

> 	lazy_mmu_mode_resume()	-> arch_enter()     count=2 enabled=1
>      lazy_mmu_mode_disable()	-> arch_flush()     count=1 enabled=1
> lazy_mmu_mode_disable()		-> arch_leave()     count=0 enabled=0
> 
> Note: in_lazy_mmu_mode() is added to <linux/sched.h> to allow arch
> headers included by <linux/pgtable.h> to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
> Alexander Gordeev suggested that a future optimisation may need
> lazy_mmu_mode_{pause,resume}() to call distinct arch callbacks [1]. For
> now arch_{leave,enter}() are called directly, but introducing new arch
> callbacks should be straightforward.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5a0818bb-75d4-47df-925c-0102f7d598f4-agordeev@linux.ibm.com/
> ---

[...]

>   
> +struct lazy_mmu_state {
> +	u8 count;

I would have called this "enabled_count" or "nesting_level".

> +	bool enabled;

"enabled" is a bit confusing when we have lazy_mmu_mode_enable().

I'd have called this "active".

> +};
> +
>   #endif /* _LINUX_MM_TYPES_TASK_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index 194b2c3e7576..269225a733de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -228,28 +228,89 @@ static inline int pmd_dirty(pmd_t pmd)
>    * of the lazy mode. So the implementation must assume preemption may be enabled
>    * and cpu migration is possible; it must take steps to be robust against this.
>    * (In practice, for user PTE updates, the appropriate page table lock(s) are
> - * held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held). Nesting is not permitted
> - * and the mode cannot be used in interrupt context.
> + * held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held). The mode cannot be used
> + * in interrupt context.
> + *
> + * The lazy MMU mode is enabled for a given block of code using:
> + *
> + *   lazy_mmu_mode_enable();
> + *   <code>
> + *   lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
> + *
> + * Nesting is permitted: <code> may itself use an enable()/disable() pair.
> + * A nested call to enable() has no functional effect; however disable() causes
> + * any batched architectural state to be flushed regardless of nesting. After a
> + * call to disable(), the caller can therefore rely on all previous page table
> + * modifications to have taken effect, but the lazy MMU mode may still be
> + * enabled.
> + *
> + * In certain cases, it may be desirable to temporarily pause the lazy MMU mode.
> + * This can be done using:
> + *
> + *   lazy_mmu_mode_pause();
> + *   <code>
> + *   lazy_mmu_mode_resume();
> + *
> + * This sequence must only be used if the lazy MMU mode is already enabled.
> + * pause() ensures that the mode is exited regardless of the nesting level;
> + * resume() re-enters the mode at the same nesting level. <code> must not modify
> + * the lazy MMU state (i.e. it must not call any of the lazy_mmu_mode_*
> + * helpers).
> + *
> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() can be used to check whether the lazy MMU mode is
> + * currently enabled.
>    */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
>   static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_enable(void)
>   {
> -	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +	struct lazy_mmu_state *state = &current->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(state->count == U8_MAX);

No VM_BUG_ON() please.

> +	/* enable() must not be called while paused */
> +	VM_WARN_ON(state->count > 0 && !state->enabled);
> +
> +	if (state->count == 0) {
> +		arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +		state->enabled = true;
> +	}
> +	++state->count;

Can do

if (state->count++ == 0) {

>   }
>   
>   static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_disable(void)
>   {
> -	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +	struct lazy_mmu_state *state = &current->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(state->count == 0);

Dito.

> +	VM_WARN_ON(!state->enabled);
> +
> +	--state->count;
> +	if (state->count == 0) {

Can do

if (--state->count == 0) {

> +		state->enabled = false;
> +		arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +	} else {
> +		/* Exiting a nested section */
> +		arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_pause(void)
>   {
> +	struct lazy_mmu_state *state = &current->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> +	VM_WARN_ON(state->count == 0 || !state->enabled);
> +
> +	state->enabled = false;
>   	arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
>   }
>   
>   static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_resume(void)
>   {
> +	struct lazy_mmu_state *state = &current->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> +	VM_WARN_ON(state->count == 0 || state->enabled);
> +
>   	arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> +	state->enabled = true;
>   }
>   #else
>   static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_enable(void) {}
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index cbb7340c5866..2862d8bf2160 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1441,6 +1441,10 @@ struct task_struct {
>   
>   	struct page_frag		task_frag;
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
> +	struct lazy_mmu_state		lazy_mmu_state;
> +#endif
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
>   	struct task_delay_info		*delays;
>   #endif
> @@ -1724,6 +1728,18 @@ static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk)
>   	return task_index_to_char(task_state_index(tsk));
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
> +static inline bool in_lazy_mmu_mode(void)

So these functions will reveal the actual arch state, not whether
_enabled() was called.

As I can see in later patches, in interrupt context they are also
return "not in lazy mmu mode".

-- 
Cheers

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15  8:27 [PATCH v3 00/13] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 16:52   ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-16  7:32     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:36   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:09     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 14:42       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:54         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:37   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-18  9:52   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-20 10:37     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:38       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-17 15:54   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-10-20 10:32     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:52   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:13     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 13:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:32         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-27 16:24           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-28 10:34             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:00   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-24 12:16     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 13:23       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:33         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:16     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:03   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:47     ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-24 14:51       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:13         ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-24 15:16           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:38           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-10-24 15:47             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:51               ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-10-27 12:38                 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 22:52         ` Demi Marie Obenour
2025-10-27 12:29           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 13:32             ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 15:05       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 15:17         ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-27 13:38           ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:08   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:17     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15  8:27 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mm: introduce arch_wants_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:17     ` Kevin Brodsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2073294c-8003-451a-93e0-9aab81de4d22@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).