From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 22:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2073294c-8003-451a-93e0-9aab81de4d22@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015082727.2395128-8-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
[...]
>
> In summary (count/enabled represent the values *after* the call):
>
> lazy_mmu_mode_enable() -> arch_enter() count=1 enabled=1
> lazy_mmu_mode_enable() -> ø count=2 enabled=1
> lazy_mmu_mode_pause() -> arch_leave() count=2 enabled=0
The arch_leave..() is expected to do a flush itself, correct?
> lazy_mmu_mode_resume() -> arch_enter() count=2 enabled=1
> lazy_mmu_mode_disable() -> arch_flush() count=1 enabled=1
> lazy_mmu_mode_disable() -> arch_leave() count=0 enabled=0
>
> Note: in_lazy_mmu_mode() is added to <linux/sched.h> to allow arch
> headers included by <linux/pgtable.h> to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
> Alexander Gordeev suggested that a future optimisation may need
> lazy_mmu_mode_{pause,resume}() to call distinct arch callbacks [1]. For
> now arch_{leave,enter}() are called directly, but introducing new arch
> callbacks should be straightforward.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5a0818bb-75d4-47df-925c-0102f7d598f4-agordeev@linux.ibm.com/
> ---
[...]
>
> +struct lazy_mmu_state {
> + u8 count;
I would have called this "enabled_count" or "nesting_level".
> + bool enabled;
"enabled" is a bit confusing when we have lazy_mmu_mode_enable().
I'd have called this "active".
> +};
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_MM_TYPES_TASK_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index 194b2c3e7576..269225a733de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -228,28 +228,89 @@ static inline int pmd_dirty(pmd_t pmd)
> * of the lazy mode. So the implementation must assume preemption may be enabled
> * and cpu migration is possible; it must take steps to be robust against this.
> * (In practice, for user PTE updates, the appropriate page table lock(s) are
> - * held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held). Nesting is not permitted
> - * and the mode cannot be used in interrupt context.
> + * held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held). The mode cannot be used
> + * in interrupt context.
> + *
> + * The lazy MMU mode is enabled for a given block of code using:
> + *
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_enable();
> + * <code>
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
> + *
> + * Nesting is permitted: <code> may itself use an enable()/disable() pair.
> + * A nested call to enable() has no functional effect; however disable() causes
> + * any batched architectural state to be flushed regardless of nesting. After a
> + * call to disable(), the caller can therefore rely on all previous page table
> + * modifications to have taken effect, but the lazy MMU mode may still be
> + * enabled.
> + *
> + * In certain cases, it may be desirable to temporarily pause the lazy MMU mode.
> + * This can be done using:
> + *
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_pause();
> + * <code>
> + * lazy_mmu_mode_resume();
> + *
> + * This sequence must only be used if the lazy MMU mode is already enabled.
> + * pause() ensures that the mode is exited regardless of the nesting level;
> + * resume() re-enters the mode at the same nesting level. <code> must not modify
> + * the lazy MMU state (i.e. it must not call any of the lazy_mmu_mode_*
> + * helpers).
> + *
> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() can be used to check whether the lazy MMU mode is
> + * currently enabled.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
> static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_enable(void)
> {
> - arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + struct lazy_mmu_state *state = ¤t->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(state->count == U8_MAX);
No VM_BUG_ON() please.
> + /* enable() must not be called while paused */
> + VM_WARN_ON(state->count > 0 && !state->enabled);
> +
> + if (state->count == 0) {
> + arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + state->enabled = true;
> + }
> + ++state->count;
Can do
if (state->count++ == 0) {
> }
>
> static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_disable(void)
> {
> - arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + struct lazy_mmu_state *state = ¤t->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(state->count == 0);
Dito.
> + VM_WARN_ON(!state->enabled);
> +
> + --state->count;
> + if (state->count == 0) {
Can do
if (--state->count == 0) {
> + state->enabled = false;
> + arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + } else {
> + /* Exiting a nested section */
> + arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + }
> }
>
> static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_pause(void)
> {
> + struct lazy_mmu_state *state = ¤t->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> + VM_WARN_ON(state->count == 0 || !state->enabled);
> +
> + state->enabled = false;
> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> }
>
> static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_resume(void)
> {
> + struct lazy_mmu_state *state = ¤t->lazy_mmu_state;
> +
> + VM_WARN_ON(state->count == 0 || state->enabled);
> +
> arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> + state->enabled = true;
> }
> #else
> static inline void lazy_mmu_mode_enable(void) {}
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index cbb7340c5866..2862d8bf2160 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1441,6 +1441,10 @@ struct task_struct {
>
> struct page_frag task_frag;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
> + struct lazy_mmu_state lazy_mmu_state;
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
> struct task_delay_info *delays;
> #endif
> @@ -1724,6 +1728,18 @@ static inline char task_state_to_char(struct task_struct *tsk)
> return task_index_to_char(task_state_index(tsk));
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU
> +static inline bool in_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
So these functions will reveal the actual arch state, not whether
_enabled() was called.
As I can see in later patches, in interrupt context they are also
return "not in lazy mmu mode".
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 8:27 [PATCH v3 00/13] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-16 7:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:09 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:54 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_LAZY_MMU Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-18 9:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-20 10:37 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-17 15:54 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-10-20 10:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 19:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:13 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 13:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-27 16:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-28 10:34 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:00 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-24 12:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 13:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 14:47 ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-24 14:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-24 15:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:38 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-10-24 15:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 15:51 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-10-27 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 22:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2025-10-27 12:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 13:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 15:05 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-24 15:17 ` David Woodhouse
2025-10-27 13:38 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:17 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-15 8:27 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] mm: introduce arch_wants_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-23 20:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 12:17 ` Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2073294c-8003-451a-93e0-9aab81de4d22@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).