From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A0CDDFA9 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:39:06 +1100 (EST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LB9AT-0004Uu-Uf for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:39:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20976787.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:39:01 -0800 (PST) From: "sarah.ddff" To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: XUPV2P + EDK 9.1 + Linux 2.4 In-Reply-To: <4941CB50.6060704@bucknell.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <4941CB50.6060704@bucknell.edu> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I have linux 2.6 running on the xupv2p with uart and ethernet. Also, I have linux 2.6 running with uart, sysace and ethernet.=20 You can find here: https://rm-rfroot.net/xupv2p/ useful instructions to por= t linux 2.4 to the xupv2p board. Juliana Su wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm relatively new to the XUPV2P. Up until about a month ago, I had been= =20 > working with an ML310. Anyway, I noticed the =E2=80=9CXUPV2P update to ke= rnel=20 > 2.6 fails=E2=80=9D thread and saw that quite a few people have been succe= ssful=20 > with the XUPV2P; I was hoping that those of you who have been successful= =20 > with the XUPV2P could help me out. >=20 > First some background... >=20 > I am using EDK 9.1, EDK 10.1, the MontaVista Linux 2.4 kernel=20 > (linuxppc_2_4_devel), and a 256 MB DDR DIMM. I was able to get a basic=20 > system (XPS UART16550, DDR SDRAM - MPMC, XPS SYSACE, Linux 2.4) made in= =20 > EDK 10.1 to work. However, I have not had any success getting a similar= =20 > system (UART16550, DDR_SDRAM_32Mx64 - PLB DDR, OPB SYSACE, Linux 2.4)=20 > built in EDK 9.1 to work. The issue is that, when I turn on the board,=20 > nothing shows up in minicom. I checked the contents of the log_buf; it=20 > was filled with junk. >=20 > My goal is a system with SysACE support, Ethernet, and the AC-97 audio=20 > CODEC that can mount a hard drive. It seems like it would be easier to=20 > create this system using EDK 9.1 than EDK 10.1. Right now, though, just= =20 > getting a basic system to work using EDK 9.1 would be great. >=20 > For those of you who have been successful with the XUPV2P, what=20 > configurations in the EDK 9.1 Base System Builder Wizard and what Linux= =20 > kernel worked for you? Any suggestions as to why I might not be getting= =20 > any output? Would it be possible for me to use Linux 2.6 or should I=20 > stick with Linux 2.4? (I feel like Linux 2.4 would be better, but I=20 > thought I would ask anyway.) Also, are there any known issues with EDK=20 > 9.1 and the XUPV2P? I vaguely remember reading about memory issues=20 > somewhere, but I can=E2=80=99t remember if they were related to EDK 9.1, = EDK=20 > 10.1, or both. >=20 > Let me know if I should provide any additional information. Thanks! >=20 >=20 > -Juliana >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded >=20 >=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XUPV2P-%2B-EDK-9.1-%2B-= Linux-2.4-tp20969433p20976787.html Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.