From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sQ4Ly5WwVzDrcD for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 00:26:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u81ENM9U057822 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:26:32 -0400 Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (e24smtp03.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.24]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 256b4ebqgf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:26:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:29 -0300 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C4D1DC0051 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:26:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.91]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u81EQQDT4260040 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:26 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u81EQQg2028664 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:26 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add kernel parameter iommu_alloc_quiet To: Torsten Duwe References: <1472734602-14330-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160901133937.GA8644@lst.de> Cc: jthumshirn@suse.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:22 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160901133937.GA8644@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Message-Id: <2098ad4f-a02f-d893-cf2f-c062e19f4dfd@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/01/2016 10:39 AM, Torsten Duwe wrote: > JFYI, my strongly preferred solution would still be to just dev_dbg() the whole thing. > Which group of people would be interested in these messages, after all? Certainly understandable. Ben didn't like the idea to convert the messages to dynamic debug [1], (with which I agree/understand nowadays) and suggested us to look for a different approach. [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2016-June/144196.html -- Mauricio Faria de Oliveira IBM Linux Technology Center