LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, dllehr@us.ibm.com, mikey@neuling.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: powernv/opal-irqchip: Fix double endian conversion
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:39:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2105708.WZ8hltFOio@new-mexico> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151207221020.11FC91402A9@ozlabs.org>

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:10:19 Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Subject should start "powerpc/", so probably "powerpc/opal-irqchip:", I can fix
> it up here.

Ok, thanks.

> On Mon, 2015-07-12 at 00:28:28 UTC, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > The OPAL event calls return a mask of events that are active in big
> > endian format. This is checked when unmasking the events in the
> > irqchip by comparison with a cached value. The cached value was stored
> > in big endian format but should've been converted to CPU endian
> > first. This bug leads to OPAL event delivery being delayed or dropped
> > on some systems.
> > 
> > The bug is fixed by calling opal_handle_events(...) instead of
> > duplicating code in opal_event_unmask(...).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
> > Reported-by: Douglas L Lehr <dllehr@us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Which commit does it fix? Looks like:
> 
> Fixes: 9f0fd0499d30 ("powerpc/powernv: Add a virtual irqchip for opal events")

Yep.

> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > index 2c91ee7..a387d18 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > @@ -43,11 +43,34 @@ static unsigned int opal_irq_count;
> >  static unsigned int *opal_irqs;
> >  
> >  static void opal_handle_irq_work(struct irq_work *work);
> > -static __be64 last_outstanding_events;
> > +static u64 last_outstanding_events;
> >  static struct irq_work opal_event_irq_work = {
> >  	.func = opal_handle_irq_work,
> >  };
> >  
> > +void opal_handle_events(uint64_t events)
> > +{
> > +	int virq, hwirq = 0;
> > +	u64 mask = opal_event_irqchip.mask;
> > +
> > +	if (!in_irq() && (events & mask)) {
> > +		last_outstanding_events = events;
> > +		irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	while (events & mask) {
> > +		hwirq = fls64(events) - 1;
> > +		if (BIT_ULL(hwirq) & mask) {
> > +			virq = irq_find_mapping(opal_event_irqchip.domain,
> > +						hwirq);
> > +			if (virq)
> > +				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > +		}
> > +		events &= ~BIT_ULL(hwirq);
> > +	}
> > +}
> 
> So this is 100% just a move of the code from down below right?

That is correct - it should be identical.

Thanks.

- Alistair

> > @@ -55,12 +78,12 @@ static void opal_event_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> >  
> >  static void opal_event_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> >  {
> > +	__be64 events;
> > +
> >  	set_bit(d->hwirq, &opal_event_irqchip.mask);
> >  
> > -	opal_poll_events(&last_outstanding_events);
> > -	if (last_outstanding_events & opal_event_irqchip.mask)
> > -		/* Need to retrigger the interrupt */
> > -		irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > +	opal_poll_events(&events);
> > +	opal_handle_events(be64_to_cpu(events));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int opal_event_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
> > @@ -96,29 +119,6 @@ static int opal_event_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -void opal_handle_events(uint64_t events)
> > -{
> > -	int virq, hwirq = 0;
> > -	u64 mask = opal_event_irqchip.mask;
> > -
> > -	if (!in_irq() && (events & mask)) {
> > -		last_outstanding_events = events;
> > -		irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > -		return;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	while (events & mask) {
> > -		hwirq = fls64(events) - 1;
> > -		if (BIT_ULL(hwirq) & mask) {
> > -			virq = irq_find_mapping(opal_event_irqchip.domain,
> > -						hwirq);
> > -			if (virq)
> > -				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > -		}
> > -		events &= ~BIT_ULL(hwirq);
> > -	}
> > -}
> > -
> >  static irqreturn_t opal_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	__be64 events;
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> >  
> >  static void opal_handle_irq_work(struct irq_work *work)
> >  {
> > -	opal_handle_events(be64_to_cpu(last_outstanding_events));
> > +	opal_handle_events(last_outstanding_events);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int opal_event_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
> 
> 
> cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-07 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-07  0:28 [PATCH] powernv/opal-irqchip: Fix double endian conversion Alistair Popple
2015-12-07 22:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-12-07 22:39   ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2015-12-14  9:46 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2105708.WZ8hltFOio@new-mexico \
    --to=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=dllehr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox