From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4036DDEF3 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:51:24 +1100 (EST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LDvgH-0005AF-95 for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:51:21 -0800 Message-ID: <21102440.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:51:21 -0800 (PST) From: Felix Radensky To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Long boot delay on 460EX with 2.6.28-rc8 In-Reply-To: <20081220003704.26bfb042@lappy.seanm.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <21070179.post@talk.nabble.com> <20081218190208.GC18201@yoda.jdub.homelinux.org> <21087072.post@talk.nabble.com> <200812190856.19482.sr@denx.de> <494C10EE.1040305@embedded-sol.com> <20081220003704.26bfb042@lappy.seanm.ca> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sean MacLennan-2 wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:23:58 +0200 > "Felix Radensky" wrote: > >> Hi, Sean >> >> Do you have any ideas what can cause such delay ? > > Sorry, I haven't been following this thread :( > > We also use a 256M NAND, although a Spansion S29GL. While there is a > small delay in u-boot, there is no noticeable during the ndfc startup. > > Can you read and write the NAND properly in u-boot? That is always the > first step. If that works, we can look at what might be different > between the u-boot and the ndfc driver. > > Cheers, > Sean > > Thanks, Sean I've found the cause of the delay. It was a stupid error on my part, not related to ndfc driver, which is fine. Thanks a lot for you work on this. I apologize for the noise. Felix. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp21070179p21102440.html Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.