From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B540FDDDEC for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:33:15 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302AA0181@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> References: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA302AA0181@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <213956050aa89759f6329f518e46f42b@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: #cpus property Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:33:05 +0100 To: "Yoder Stuart-B08248" Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Anyone know the origin of the #cpus property that seems to be in most > of > the DTS files. It seems to be documented nowhere. It was there in the first DTS file to hit the kernel source tree. Probably all others just copied that. > It's obviously describing how many cpus exist. However, greping the > kernel source turns up no references to it. > > Is it supposed to be required for all cpus nodes? Are there plans to > actually use it? It is utterly redundant as simply looking at the number of child nodes of /cpus/ will tell you the same thing. Well *hopefully* the same thing, heh. Segher