From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from penguin.netx4.com (embeddededge.com [209.113.146.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFF7686C9 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:14:20 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20051108224658.98933352B33@atlas.denx.de> References: <20051108224658.98933352B33@atlas.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <221fe35aeb5c9a16cd2a019300e16efc@embeddededge.com> From: Dan Malek Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:20:30 -0500 To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Tom Rini , David Jander , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: fix swapping on 8xx? List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 8, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hm... as far as I can remember .... Yes, your patch looks correct. I'll just map these changes on top of the PTEs to verify there aren't some status bits that we may still incorrectly update. When I originally selected the bit positions for the PTEs I didn't properly consider the usage of the PTE during swap (nor did I always have the options I wanted :-)) Among everything else I promised, I'll try to get all of these updates quickly sorted out. Thanks for all of these pointers to old patches, saves me time looking them up :-) -- Dan