From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A41DDE0F for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:55:01 +1100 (EST) From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20081211093709.30ca04f6@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20081211093709.30ca04f6@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20081211125354.20641.23213.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Rename PowerPC's struct vm_region Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:54:57 +0000 Message-ID: <23168.1229007297@redhat.com> Sender: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > Is there a reason you renamed all the function names as well when they > are static? Well, static functions can still conflict with a function of the same name that's declared globally in a header file, but mainly because M-x replace-string doesn't differentiate. David