From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3s51qT3YlzzDqQ1 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 06:33:40 +1000 (AEST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , zajec5@gmail.com, leoli@freescale.com, qiang.zhao@freescale.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, scottwood@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net Subject: Re: [v5.1] ucc_fast: Fix to avoid IS_ERR_VALUE abuses and dead code on 64bit systems. Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: <2376517.GXv6XVOdDd@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <1470329563-5464-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> References: <1470329563-5464-1-git-send-email-arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:22:43 PM CEST Arvind Yadav wrote: > index df8ea79..ada9070 100644 > --- a/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h > +++ b/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h > @@ -165,10 +165,12 @@ struct ucc_fast_private { > int stopped_tx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Tx > (STOP_TX, etc.) */ > int stopped_rx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Rx */ > - u32 ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Tx > - virtual fifo */ > - u32 ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Rx > - virtual fifo */ > + unsigned long ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of > + * Tx virtual fifo > + */ > + unsigned long ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of > + * Rx virtual fifo > + */ > #ifdef STATISTICS > u32 tx_frames; /* Transmitted frames counter. */ > u32 rx_frames; /* Received frames counter (only frames > This change seems ok, but what about the other u32 variables in ucc_geth.c that get checked for IS_ERR_VALUE? Arnd