From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384B81A005D for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 01:40:04 +1100 (AEDT) From: Arnd Bergmann To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Li Yang , Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jia Hongtao , Eduardo Valentin , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] cpufreq: qoriq: Register cooling device based on device tree Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:39:37 +0100 Message-ID: <2383054.EjbA6kk0Xz@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <1448529671-48216-1-git-send-email-hongtao.jia@freescale.com> <8056913.EWiGLtcdOV@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 29 February 2016 15:33:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Note the check on !CPU_THERMAL rather than !THERMAL in my patch, that > > part was correct. I think the line should be > > > > depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL > > > > as some other drivers do. I must have copied the line > > from ARM_MT8173_CPUFREQ, which is a 'bool' symbol, when > > it should have been the same as ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ and > > CPUFREQ_DT. > > OK, so any chance to update the patch? > I've committed the update locally now, and will follow up tomorrow with a new patch, unless it causes another build-time regression. I'll also send the respective update for the mediatek driver, making that a tristate option. Arnd