From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A1FB70B2 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:55:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0717EDDD0B for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:55:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MLcsI-0003xI-Q8 for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:55:50 -0700 Message-ID: <24271342.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:55:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Felix Radensky To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Preemption question (4xx related) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, Preemption is disabled on the vast majority of powerpc targets. Are there any known problems in this area ? I'd like to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY on AMCC 405EX target, to increase application responsiveness. Is it a bad idea ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Preemption-question-%284xx-related%29-tp24271342p24271342.html Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.