From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3yGmrj1y7szDqlv for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:24:52 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions To: Andy Shevchenko , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Julia Lawall , Alexander Steffen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Corentin Labbe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Jerry Snitselaar , Kenneth Goldman , Michael Ellerman , Nayna Jain , Paul Mackerras , =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_H=c3=bcwe?= , Stefan Berger References: <1d3516a2-a8e6-9e95-d438-f115fac84c7f@users.sourceforge.net> <83a166af-aecc-649d-dfe3-a72245345209@users.sourceforge.net> <1508238182.16112.475.camel@linux.intel.com> <1508244757.4234.60.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1508253453.4234.81.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <9689f036-ba9f-d23b-cf89-c289bc308771@users.sourceforge.net> <1508269017.16112.492.camel@linux.intel.com> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <24454301-011a-bd60-ffce-5c14b1c76f48@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:24:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1508269017.16112.492.camel@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> I imagine that a corresponding source code analysis variant could be applied >> in more cases if sufficient acceptance could be achieved. > > So, then instead of still keeping people busy with this noise you better > start doing something like CI integration with that for *new* code? There are various software development challenges to consider. > I'm pretty sure you may also exercise your achievements on > drivers/staging where it would be honored. I am waiting for several improvements also for software components in this area for a while. Would you like to take another look at these change possibilities? > Have you talked to Fengguang (0-day LKP)? Not directly for this topic so far. > Have you talked to Arnd (I think he is related to kernel-ci)? I am curious on how he will respond to remaining open issues. Regards, Markus