From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [66.187.237.31]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40082DDD0C for ; Tue, 5 May 2009 19:46:24 +1000 (EST) From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <200905041802.30527.hannes.hering@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <200905041802.30527.hannes.hering@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Hannes Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc5] ehea: fix invalid pointer access Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 10:11:27 +0100 Message-ID: <25628.1241514687@redhat.com> Sender: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ossrosch@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, ossthema@de.ibm.com, osstklei@de.ibm.com, David Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hannes Hering wrote: > pref = skb_array[x]; > - prefetchw(pref); > - prefetchw(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE); > + if (pref) { > + prefetchw(pref); > + prefetchw(pref + EHEA_CACHE_LINE); Ummm... Is prefetch() or prefetchw() faulting? David