From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Michael Neuling To: Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH 63/63] powerpc: Add pseries_le_defconfig In-reply-to: <20130808175324.735c1575@kryten> References: <1375804940-22050-1-git-send-email-anton@samba.org> <1375804940-22050-64-git-send-email-anton@samba.org> <2419.1375831860@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20130808175324.735c1575@kryten> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 09:12:37 +1000 Message-ID: <25736.1376003557@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Hi, > > > The CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION disabling should be done in the Kconfig not > > here. > > > > I'm not that keen on another defconfig. benh is already talking about > > having a powernv defconfig. I'm worried we are going to fragment the > > defconfigs. If you want something special like LE, then change the > > default one. > > I agree we don't want machine specific defconfigs, but I think it makes > sense to have ones that cover the key options that conflict. I'm > thinking 32bit, 64bit, 64bit BookE, 64bit LE etc. > > One bonus is if we have a smaller set of defconfigs we might actually > get better testing. I have no idea which 32bit defconfigs I should test > for example, and I'm not going to test them all! FWIW, I test with these configs and it seems to catch most of 32/64 bit, SMP/UP, differnt MMU issues: pseries_defconfig ppc64_defconfig ppc64e_defconfig pmac32_defconfig ppc44x_defconfig ppc6xx_defconfig mpc85xx_smp_defconfig mpc85xx_defconfig chroma_defconfig ps3_defconfig celleb_defconfig Mikey