From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675EA67C18 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:14:40 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20061003230543.6cc82325@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061003223054.06e25136@localhost.localdomain> <20061003230543.6cc82325@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <25B4D3AA-3AA4-44B2-B637-B55059F81D12@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: Please pull upstream branch of linux-2.6-PQ.git... Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:14:53 -0500 To: Vitaly Bordug Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 3, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:43:35 -0500 > Kumar Gala wrote: > >> >> On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> Please do a pull from >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vitb/linux-2.6- >>> PQ.git, upstream branch. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug >>> >>> >>> To receive the updated 8272 addition to the arch/powerpc. >>> All the comments have been addressed, and it has a minor bugfix >>> addressed too in order to make both pq2 and pq3 >>> co-exist happily in fsl_soc.c. CPM PIC now has "compatible" >>> property that could be "CPM2" or "CPM1" for PQ/8xx. >>> >>> I think it should go to rc1, because relevant stuff in ppc/ is >>> more or less broken now, with new irq engine. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts | 223 ++++++++++ >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Kconfig | 21 >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/Makefile | 5 >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/m82xx_pci.h | 19 >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx.c | 111 +++++ >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/mpc82xx_ads.c | 661 >>> ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++ >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/pq2ads.h | 67 +++ >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c | 2 >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.h | 2 >>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c | 62 ++ >>> 11 files changed, 1165 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> Are there updates to the flat dev spec for the CPM nodes? That is >> my only hold up on ack'ing all this good PQ2/PQ3 CPM work. >> > > It is coming along with QE docs, on top of it, since we decided to > make CPM a "sibliing". > I'll follow-up with the stuff in the separate domain if we've no > chance to get QE thing in this time. > Though, tha't not what will be good, because we should keep clear, > how similar are CPM and QE. > > Again, most of the node things are self-explanatory and assuming > ppc/ entity of 8272 does not > function properly anymore, I really want this in rc1. There are > many boards like it, so this will encourage people > to move to the powerpc which with a reference much more simple than > fix ppc/ irq stuff. > > So, as a recap physically spec is ready, just depending on QE spec > that is floating around still :) > And, having 85xx cpm2 stuff in the Linus' mainline atm, there's no > much reason holding this, is there ;) ? I agree. How about posting the lastest cpm2 spec to the list. - k