From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.86]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7D32B7CBB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:34:21 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <26163.54141.qm@web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:34:19 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Dubov Subject: Re: Large physical address support on e500 platform To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > =0A> > So, the obvious question is, what is the current=0A> status of lar= ge physical=0A> > address support on e500? Is it a problem in current=0A> g= it version or is it=0A> > not ready yet?=0A> > =0A> > Thanks.=0A> =0A> Its = possible that we've broken module/vmalloc support with=0A> "Large physical = addressing".=A0 Its not something I've=0A> tried in a while.=A0 What kernel= /git SHA are you using.=0A> =0A=0AI'm just pulling in from the main kernel = tree git.=0AMy current version is 2.6.33-rc4-00193-gd1e4922-dirty,=0Abut it= had not changed since 2.6.33-rc2=0A=0AI started from 2.6.32, but I don't r= emember if I had a large PA=0Asupport enabled there.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A __= ___________________________________________________________________________= _____=0ASee what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: http://au.m= ovies.yahoo.com/session-times/