From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D1DDE17 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:54:51 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1181720633.12936.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1181717615.9397.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <6dc1593b8ff8442f7b4cf7a01f69c07c@kernel.crashing.org> <1181718898.12936.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1181720633.12936.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <26a24ad5f123db79f880f8c53cf2c71f@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]: Fix e500 v2 core reboot bug Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:54:43 +0200 To: Zang Roy-r61911 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> There is no real reason to break the string in two anyway, it >> is fine to have a more-than-80-char line in printk messages. >> > I separate it, because I am afraid I will be challenged by 80 char > column rule. Yeah, I understand. > Please check the CodeStyle file and its example: [snip] > If it does not matter, I'd like to put them in one line :-). Current thinking on this seems to be that long literal strings are fine. You are right that some people might challenge you on this, of course ;-) Segher