From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1F41A020A for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:09:58 +1100 (AEDT) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/16] PCI: Enhance pci_scan_root_bus() to support default IO/MEM resources Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:08:34 +0100 Message-ID: <2732970.7HG94QvVBv@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <1416219710-26088-2-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> References: <1416219710-26088-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1416219710-26088-2-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Liviu Dudau , Tony Luck , Russell King , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Bjorn Helgaas , Thierry Reding , Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, Yijing Wang , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Wuyun , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Yijing Wang List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 17 November 2014 18:21:35 Yijing Wang wrote: > - list_for_each_entry(window, resources, list) > - if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) { > - found = true; > - break; > - } > + if (!resources) { > + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &ioport_resource); > + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &iomem_resource); > + pci_add_resource(&default_res, &busn_resource); > + } else { > Isn't it almost always wrong to do this? You are adding all of the I/O ports and memory to the host bridge, which will prevent you from adding another host bridge, and the iomem_resource normally includes a lot of addresses that are not accessible by the PCI host. Arnd