From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D7F67C2D for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:44:10 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4586BA3F.5030209@freescale.com> References: <00b001c7222f$c4d63b50$1e67a8c0@Jocke> <4586BA3F.5030209@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <27EF3DDC-DD21-4EAA-A3F2-36FD21BA1696@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: latest linux git doesn't compile ucc_geth_phy.c and ucc_geth.c Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:44:19 -0600 To: Timur Tabi Cc: 'linuxppc-dev' List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>> I've tested these on an 8360EMDS, and Kumar has reviewed and >>> signed off on the >>> code, so I think they're good. Please let me know if they're not. >> >> Has these been sent upstream yet? Didn't se them in linux tree as >> of now. > > I posted the patches to the linuxppc-dev and netdev mailing lists. > At this > point, these patches are at the whim of Paul M. and/or Jeff G. for > merging. > Since the holidays are upon us, I'm not surprised that things are > taking longer > than normal. There really at the whim of Jeff G. since they are completely driver related. I pinged Jeff G. to hopefully pick them up and push them for 2.6.20. - k