linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	irogers@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/arch/powerpc: Add register mask for power11 PVR in extended regs
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:32:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2907ca2f-b973-42fd-ae03-99732dfda7a1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206135637.36166-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>



On 12/6/24 19:26, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform
> supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> as part of each sample. This mask value is decided based on
> the processor version ( from PVR ).
> 
> Add PVR value for power11 to enable capturing the extended regs
> as part of sample in power11.

Patch looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>


> 
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index e8e6e6fc6f17..bd36cfd420a2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  
>  #define PVR_POWER9		0x004E
>  #define PVR_POWER10		0x0080
> +#define PVR_POWER11		0x0082
>  
>  static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>  	SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
>  	version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >>  16) & 0xFFFF);
>  	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
>  		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> -	else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
> +	else if ((version == PVR_POWER10) || (version == PVR_POWER11))
>  		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
>  	else
>  		return mask;



  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-11 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 13:56 [PATCH] tools/perf/arch/powerpc: Add register mask for power11 PVR in extended regs Athira Rajeev
2024-12-11 12:02 ` kajoljain [this message]
2024-12-16 10:02   ` Athira Rajeev
2024-12-16 16:45     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-17  6:27       ` Athira Rajeev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2907ca2f-b973-42fd-ae03-99732dfda7a1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).