linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thiago Jung Bauermann" <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, buendgen@de.ibm.com,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"Frank van der Linden" <fllinden@amazon.com>,
	"Jessica Yu" <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Hari Bathini" <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Daniel Axtens" <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 08:10:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <290c0097271c68f5a9fd1e8f6fdb542631981b33.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124120950.57c10a9f@rhtmp>

On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote:
> Now Michal wants to adapt KEXEC_SIG for ppc too so distros can rely on all
> architectures using the same mechanism and thus reduce maintenance cost.
> On the way there he even makes some absolutely reasonable improvements
> for everybody.
> 
> Why is that so controversial? What is the real problem that should be
> discussed here?

Nothing is controversial with what Michal wants to do.  I've already
said, "As for adding KEXEC_SIG appended signature support on PowerPC
based on the s390 code, it sounds reasonable."

thanks,

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-03 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: strip the signature marker in the verification function Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05  9:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] Additional appended signature cleanup Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05  9:55   ` [PATCH 1/2] module: Use key_being_used_for for log messages in verify_appended_signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05  9:55   ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 10:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Daniel Axtens
2021-11-05 13:14   ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-07 22:18     ` Daniel Axtens
2021-11-08 12:05       ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-11 22:26         ` Nayna
2021-11-12  8:30           ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-15 23:53             ` Nayna
2021-11-16  9:53               ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-18 22:34                 ` Nayna
2021-11-19 11:18                   ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-19 18:16                     ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 11:09                       ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-24 13:10                         ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2021-11-24 13:27                           ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-25  9:14                             ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-11 22:23     ` Nayna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=290c0097271c68f5a9fd1e8f6fdb542631981b33.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=fllinden@amazon.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prudo@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).