* [PATCH V5 2/2] cpufreq: Reuse new freq-table helpers
[not found] <cover.1467001203.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
@ 2016-06-27 4:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-07-07 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-06-27 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman
Cc: linaro-kernel, linux-pm, linux-kernel, steve.muckle, linuxppc-dev
This patch migrates few users of cpufreq tables to the new helpers that
work on sorted freq-tables.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++++----------
drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c | 4 ++--
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 6 ++----
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 3 +--
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 32a15052f363..11c9a078e0fd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -468,20 +468,14 @@ unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
- unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, freq;
+ unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, index;
/*
* Find the closest frequency above target_freq.
- *
- * The table is sorted in the reverse order with respect to the
- * frequency and all of the entries are valid (see the initialization).
*/
- entry = policy->freq_table;
- do {
- entry++;
- freq = entry->frequency;
- } while (freq >= target_freq && freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
- entry--;
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
+
+ entry = &policy->freq_table[index];
next_freq = entry->frequency;
next_perf_state = entry->driver_data;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
index 6d5dc04c3a37..042023bbbf62 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static unsigned int amd_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else {
unsigned int index;
- index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy,
- policy->cur - 1, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy,
+ policy->cur - 1);
freq_next = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 0c93cd9dee99..3a1f49f5f4c6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -85,11 +85,9 @@ static unsigned int generic_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
freq_avg = freq_req - freq_reduc;
/* Find freq bounds for freq_avg in freq_table */
- index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, freq_avg);
freq_lo = freq_table[index].frequency;
- index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, freq_avg);
freq_hi = freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Find out how long we have to be in hi and lo freqs */
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index b29c5c20c3a1..2a2920c4fdf9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
- index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.cur,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 4f4e9df9b7fc..9e07588ea9f5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Finding current running level index */
- priv_index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, old_freq,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ priv_index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, old_freq);
arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread