From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76762DDEC2 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:36:40 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070424223812.2842f3f2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20070403105217.7b9fea08.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223000.5d44b2f1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223136.6ecdabbd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223257.cb8c4d15.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223535.dd6731d6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223738.03386a13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403223914.35bf04e1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224039.913af749.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224205.807cffe0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224340.5533abc9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224505.5d5a1495.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224610.b61c7377.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403224937.f6a07e56.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403225059.e735b5e4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403225222.88e92221.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403230505.f96ea210.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403232406.ab9a3c86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070412141905.6f30efd3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070412153424.bf3957f4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070424223245.78f4fdfb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070424223812.2842f3f2.sfr@canb.auug .org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <295332a6632aee95ba1acda89a47afd4@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Consolidate of_device_is_compatible Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:36:18 +0200 To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: ppc-dev , paulus@samba.org, "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match > compatibility > names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp. The sparc behaviour is correct here (not that the powerpc behaviour hurts much, but...) Perhaps add a note about this? Segher