From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0864CDDF01 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:53:06 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <2AF4947A-B0E5-4530-9240-55C94A73E9FC@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior In-Reply-To: <1222896024-22172-4-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dtb and purgatory support for ppc32 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:52:37 -0500 References: <1222896024-22172-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <1222896024-22172-4-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sebastian Siewior , kexec@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > From: Sebastian Siewior > > Some code dtb scanning & filling has been borrowed from ppc64. > The old behavior is still available if compiled with GameCube, > other PowerPC platform use the can purgatory and specify a new > dtb. > The purgatory is disabled because somehting is wrong and I dunno > the reason. Booting a self containd cuImage (incl. dtb / wiuthout > the need for a bd sturct) can be booted. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > kexec/arch/ppc/Makefile | 1 + > kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-ppc.c | 167 ++++++++++---- > kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-elf-rel-ppc.c | 4 + > kexec/arch/ppc/kexec-ppc.c | 469 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ++++++++- > purgatory/arch/ppc/Makefile | 1 + > purgatory/arch/ppc/purgatory-ppc.c | 4 + > purgatory/arch/ppc/v2wrap.S | 54 ++++ > 7 files changed, 652 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 purgatory/arch/ppc/v2wrap.S I think I might have realized some of my confusion.. is this patch to the kernel or to some kexec tool? If its to the kernel I don't answer at all. If its to some kexec tool than that wasn't clear at all. - k