From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A83679E0 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 2006 01:39:17 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD467305790AEB@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> References: <9FCDBA58F226D911B202000BDBAD467305790AEB@zch01exm40.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2DAA97AA-4DB6-4E2B-A702-729681BCA478@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: moving board support from arch/ppc/ to arch/powerpc Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:39:20 -0600 To: Zang Roy-r61911 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Paul Mackerras , linux kernel mailing list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 31, 2006, at 4:44 AM, Zang Roy-r61911 wrote: > Hi, > I am moving mpc7448 hpc2 support from arch/ppc to arch/powerpc and > plan to summit it to open source tree future. Is there any good > suggestion or reference? > Thanks a lot! All ports under arch/powerpc are required to use a flat device tree to boot. Look at Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt for details on how that is done. Beyond that there isn't too much different from arch/ppc to arch/powerpc. Take a look at the 83xx or 85xx platforms for comparison examples between arch/ppc & arch/powerpc. I'd suggest for working up your flat dev tree for the bridge on HPC2 and post that to the linuxppc-dev list for review and then go from there. - kumar