From: "Li Yang" <leoli@freescale.com>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:15:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a27d3730809242015j31fe1addgc2fac720ede146eb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40809221520n65c254b7ie7bb72e4ad4f96ac@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>> Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with
>>> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and
>>> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded?
>>
>> you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded"
>> -mike
>
> See! My point proven! That list just causes confusion. :-)
>
> Oops. I've cc'd the linuxppc-embedded list now. Sorry to all the
> non-powerpc linux-embedded folks for the noise.
I agree. Given the fact that most active embedded people are already
watching the linuxppc-dev list. It's a good idea for embedded people
not having to subscribe two lists. But I don't know if non-embedded
people would like this idea.
- Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-25 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 22:08 Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Grant Likely
2008-09-22 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-09-22 22:20 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-25 3:15 ` Li Yang [this message]
2008-09-22 23:09 ` Jeremy Kerr
2008-09-22 23:34 ` Kumar Gala
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2008-09-23 14:55 ` Koss, Mike (Mission Systems)
2008-09-23 14:58 ` Becky Bruce
2008-09-23 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Martyn Welch
[not found] <mailman.1665.1222182678.3127.linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
2008-09-23 15:19 ` Wright, Chuck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a27d3730809242015j31fe1addgc2fac720ede146eb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).