From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E081DDDD8 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:15:42 +1000 (EST) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so71790eyi.15 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a27d3730809242015j31fe1addgc2fac720ede146eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:15:40 +0800 From: "Li Yang" Sender: pku.leo@gmail.com To: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <8bd0f97a0809221511v1aba47eemb1630f7e64412e4@mail.gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , Mike Frysinger , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 18:08, Grant Likely wrote: >>> Jeremy, >>> >>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with >>> linuxppc-dev? I don't think we need two separate lists anymore and >>> patches to linuxppc-embedded don't always get dealt with. >>> >>> Anyone have any objections to eliminating linuxppc-embedded? >> >> you sent this e-mail to "linux-embedded" instead of "linuxppc-embedded" >> -mike > > See! My point proven! That list just causes confusion. :-) > > Oops. I've cc'd the linuxppc-embedded list now. Sorry to all the > non-powerpc linux-embedded folks for the noise. I agree. Given the fact that most active embedded people are already watching the linuxppc-dev list. It's a good idea for embedded people not having to subscribe two lists. But I don't know if non-embedded people would like this idea. - Leo